Georgia Tech CRC - Atlanta, GA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | TRAVAGLINO Stefano | V V V V V V | V V V V V V | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
2 | SWENSON Keane J. | V D V V D | V V V V V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
3 | VERNACHIO Anthony | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
3 | DANZIG Jacob S. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.2 | 6 | +1.8 |
5 | CAI Brian | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.2 | 6 | +1.8 |
6 | ARIAS Troy A. | V V V V D | V V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
7 | BENDER Rhys T. | D D V V V | V V V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
8 | FLOYD Sean C. | V D V V D | V V V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
9 | ELLINGTON Keegan A. | V V V V V | V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
11 | BLAND Ian A. | D V V V V | V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
12 | RAMCHARAN Zachary K. | V D V V V | V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
13 | MALLOY Patrick G. | V V V D V | V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
14 | YIM Nathan H. | V V V D V | V V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
15 | KIM Alexander | D V V V V | V V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
16 | WAGNER Lyndsay K. | V V V D V D | V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
17 | JUNG Ho(Daniel) (Daniel) Y. | V V V V V V | V D | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
18 | HAN Matthew | V V V V V V | V D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
19 | AWAN Saqlain A. | D V V V V V | V D | 2.8 | 5 | +2.2 |
20 | LIU Darren | D V V V V V | V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
21 | BEACH Nicholas | D V V V V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
22 | TINSLEY Cole | D V V V V | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
23 | WALKER IV Weymouth D. | V V V D V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
24 | PANTALONE Giuseppe A. | V V D V V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
25 | JAAFAR Youssef | V V V D D V | V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
26 | LEA Russell J. | V V V D D V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
27 | SINGH Arnav | V D V D V | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
28 | MCGRATH Russell D. | D V V V D | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
29 | CUNNINGHAM Jr. John P. | V V V D D | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
30 | PARAMESH Dhilan R. | V V V D D D | V D | 4.3 | 3 | -1.3 |
31 | YANG Justin T. | V D D D V | V V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
32 | EDWARDS Darby | V D D V D | V V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
33 | SAYLOR David A. | V V D V V | D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
34 | PARCELEWICZ John M. | D V V V V | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
36 | DULISSE Alex | D V V V V D | D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
37 | JANOWSKI Madeline (Madeline Janowski) A. | D V V V V D | D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
38 | KERTESZ Stefan | D V V V D V | D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
39 | MCAREAVEY James | V D D V V | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
40 | HEINZE Luke H. | V D V D V | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
41 | LANGE Eric A. | D V D V V | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
42 | CRISTIAN Ana | D V D V V | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
43 | JAAFAR Adam | D V D V V | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
44 | GUNDUBOGULA Raj | V V V D D | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
45 | COPELAND Raymond | V D D V V D | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
46 | NG Joshua Z. | V V D D V D | D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
47 | PROCTER Jonathan R. | D D V D V V | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
48 | ATON Dave | D V D D V V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
49 | WEBB Jacob T. | D V D V V D | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
50 | VALES Keyan | V V D D D | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
51 | MERRIMAN Morgan | D D V V D | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
53 | CHAKRABORTY Rishi N. | V D D V D | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
54 | JORDAN Jonathan ". | D D V V D | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
56 | ZIMINSKY Karel M. | V D D V D D | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
57 | DREITZLER Nicholas | V D V D D D | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
58 | BOBERTZ Hogan | V D D D D V | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
59 | LIU Edward | V D D D V D | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
60 | AMMON Blue | V D D D D V | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
61 | JAAFAR Omar | D V D V D D | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
62 | LEE Kennith | D V D D D | V D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
63 | COOPER Judson | V D D D D | V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
64 | SUN Kevin | D D D D D | V D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
65 | CHRONISTER Charles | D D V V D D | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
66 | WAKEFIELD Rachel | D D D V V D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
67 | SHAH Anuj | D V D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
68 | WILSON Ashley | V D D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
69 | MCCONNELL Leslie | D D V D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
70 | CUADRA Oscar | V D D D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
71 | MERMIGKAS John | D D D D V D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
72 | PRICE Ethan | D D D D D V | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
73 | RICKMAN II Samuel B. | D D D D D V | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
74 | KOMORNIK Michael | D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
74 | GARTNER Kara | D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
76 | KOKA Ashwin | D D D D D | D | 2.2 | 0 | -2.2 |
77 | CHUMNEY Ben | D D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
79 | PRICE Makalyn W. | D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
82 | TO Hang Minh | D D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
82 | GARTNER Kacie | D D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.