Georgia Tech CRC - Atlanta, GA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | QURESHI Afzal (AJ) A. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
| 2 | DOARES Andrew | V V V V | V V V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 3 | HOOKASSIAN Austin N. | V V D V V V | V V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 3 | FONZO Ian | V V V V V V | V V V D | 3.7 | 6 | +2.3 |
| 5 | IZENSON William (Will) P. | V V D V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 6 | EDWARDS Darby | D V D V V V | V V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 7 | JACOB Bret | D V D V V V | V V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 8 | SCHUTZ Katherine G. | D D V V V | V V V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 9 | LOGGINS Austin J. | V V V V V V | V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
| 10 | JARDIM Kyle A. | V V V V V V | V D | 3.7 | 6 | +2.3 |
| 11 | MENKE Kavya I. | V V V D V V | D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 12 | RAULS Jackson V. | V V V D D V | V V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 13 | MCGOWEN Collin | V V D V V D | V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 14 | KELLNER Taylor T. | D V V V D | V V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 15 | FANG Zhou | V V D V D | V V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 16 | LENTHART Robert (Ian) I. | D D V D V V | V V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 17 | PINEDA Gabriel U. | V V V V V V | D | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
| 18 | RICH Jack | V V V D V | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 19 | JUTRAS Daniel G. | D D V V V V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 20 | LISSO Ria A. | V V V V D D | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 21 | WHEAT Ryun B. | V V D V V D | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 22 | ARDOIN Cameron | D D V V V V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 23 | SON Daniel J. | V V V D D V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 24 | WALLACE Cade | V V D D | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 25 | NORTON Stephen | D V V V | V D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
| 27 | SU Thalia | D D V D V V | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 28 | CROWLEY James | D V V D V D | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 29 | SILVA Daniel | V V V D D D | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 30 | JUNG Ho(Daniel) (Daniel) Y. | V D D D V | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 31 | RICHERSON James | D V D V D D | V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 32 | BOND Christopher D. | D D D V D V | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 33 | DAWSON Todd | V V D V D D | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 34 | ROBINSON Wesley | D D V V V D | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 35 | GRAHAM Ian | V D V D D V | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 37 | YANG Jenny J. | V D V D V D | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 38 | FOGARTY Katie | D V D V D D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 39 | JOHNSON Julia F. | D D D D V V | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 40 | VO Khanh D. | V V D D D D | 0.8 | 2 | +1.2 | |
| 41 | SEGARD Ian | D D D V V D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 42 | WOOD Mitchell | D V V D D D | D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
| 43 | LIU Iris | D V D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 44 | GIRARD Parker | D D V D D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 45 | HE Cassandra | D D V D D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 45 | MARAGULOVA Veronika | D V D D D D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
| 47 | CREVELING Kathryn | D D D V D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 48 | BAKER Matthew | D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
| 49 | YU Johnathan | D D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
| 50 | WEST Matthew S. | D D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
| 51 | WATKINS Christopher M. | D D D D D D | D | 2.5 | 0 | -2.5 |
| 52 | HOPKINS William | D D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
| 54 | BOWE Trey | D D D D D D | D | 2.2 | 0 | -2.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.