Georgia Tech CRC - Atlanta, GA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | QURESHI Afzal (AJ) A. | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 46% | 36% |
| 2 | DOARES Andrew | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 53% | ||
| 3 | HOOKASSIAN Austin N. | - | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 12% |
| 3 | FONZO Ian | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
| 5 | IZENSON William (Will) P. | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% |
| 6 | EDWARDS Darby | - | 3% | 14% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 4% |
| 7 | JACOB Bret | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 1% |
| 8 | SCHUTZ Katherine G. | 2% | 21% | 40% | 28% | 7% | 1% | |
| 9 | LOGGINS Austin J. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 43% | 24% |
| 10 | JARDIM Kyle A. | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
| 11 | MENKE Kavya I. | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% |
| 12 | RAULS Jackson V. | - | - | 1% | 11% | 38% | 41% | 9% |
| 13 | MCGOWEN Collin | - | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 14 | KELLNER Taylor T. | - | 2% | 19% | 48% | 27% | 4% | |
| 15 | FANG Zhou | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 33% | 12% | |
| 16 | LENTHART Robert (Ian) I. | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
| 17 | PINEDA Gabriel U. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 30% | 43% | 19% |
| 18 | RICH Jack | - | 5% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 6% | |
| 19 | JUTRAS Daniel G. | - | 6% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 4% | - |
| 20 | LISSO Ria A. | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 8% |
| 21 | WHEAT Ryun B. | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 22 | ARDOIN Cameron | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 38% | 18% | 2% |
| 23 | SON Daniel J. | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 6% |
| 24 | WALLACE Cade | 7% | 30% | 40% | 20% | 3% | ||
| 25 | NORTON Stephen | 9% | 39% | 37% | 13% | 1% | ||
| 27 | SU Thalia | - | 4% | 16% | 30% | 30% | 15% | 3% |
| 28 | CROWLEY James | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 29 | SILVA Daniel | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 1% |
| 30 | JUNG Ho(Daniel) (Daniel) Y. | 1% | 9% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 3% | |
| 31 | RICHERSON James | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 32 | BOND Christopher D. | 6% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 33 | DAWSON Todd | 4% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 34 | ROBINSON Wesley | - | 4% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
| 35 | GRAHAM Ian | - | 7% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 37 | YANG Jenny J. | 4% | 18% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 3% | - |
| 38 | FOGARTY Katie | 5% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 39 | JOHNSON Julia F. | 6% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 40 | VO Khanh D. | 42% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 41 | SEGARD Ian | - | 32% | 44% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 42 | WOOD Mitchell | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 5% |
| 43 | LIU Iris | 8% | 34% | 40% | 16% | 2% | ||
| 44 | GIRARD Parker | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 45 | HE Cassandra | 9% | 28% | 34% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 45 | MARAGULOVA Veronika | 55% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 47 | CREVELING Kathryn | 18% | 43% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 48 | BAKER Matthew | 12% | 39% | 37% | 11% | 1% | ||
| 49 | YU Johnathan | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 50 | WEST Matthew S. | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 51 | WATKINS Christopher M. | 1% | 11% | 37% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 52 | HOPKINS William | 10% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 54 | BOWE Trey | 4% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.