UWM Sports Complex - Pontiac, MI, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | MODANLOU Navid | V V V V V D | V V V V V | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 2 | MITEV Alexander | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
| 3 | BORISENKO Samuel | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 3 | GRAVES Lawson | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 5 | NORMILE Nicholas | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
| 6 | MA YIXING (Tiger) | V V V D V V | V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 7 | SOBESHKEVYCH ROMAN | V V D V V V | V V D | 5.4 | 5 | -0.4 |
| 8 | SAUNIER Cameron | V D V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 9 | ZHAI Junqi | V V V V D V | V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 10 | DODIN Daniel M. | V V D V V V | V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 11 | FRANGER Max | V D V V V V | V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 12 | HUANG Kenneth | V D V V V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 13 | LOISEAU Oscar | V V V D V | V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 14 | ZHAO Pierce | D V V V D V | V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 15 | IPPOLITO-JOHN Matteo | D V V V D | V V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 16 | CHUTKAY Sai Pratham | D V D V V | V V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 17 | CHEN Bowen | V V V V D | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 18 | CHEN Isaac Zhi | V V V D V D | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 19 | KIM Gene | D D V V V V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 20 | CAFASSO Alexander | V D V D V | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 20 | CHEN Jayden | V D V D V | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 22 | HONG Daniel | V V V D D | V D | 1.0 | 3 | +2.0 |
| 23 | SONG Aidan | D V D V V | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 24 | CHO Alex | V D V V D | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 25 | CAMP Ethan | D D D V V V | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 26 | HERDMAN Julian | D D D V V V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 27 | DANG William | V V D D D V | V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 28 | LIU Andrew | D V V V D D | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 29 | WANG Kaiyan | V D V D D | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 30 | KROPP Wesley | D D D V V | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 31 | TOWNSHEND Connor | D V D D V D | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 32 | MEHROTRA Neel | D D D D V | V D | 3.2 | 1 | -2.2 |
| 33 | BAGDONAS Olivier | D V D V V | D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 34 | GOODMAN Liam | D V D D D V | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 35 | SOLOMON Aryeh | V V D D D D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 36 | GRIGORENKO Gleb E. | D V V D D D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 37 | ZHAI Christopher | V D V D D D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 38 | SONG Sawyer | D D D V D V | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 39 | HANTOV Adrian | D D D V V D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 40 | HUANG Max | V D V D D D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 41 | LIM-SEIWERT Armand | D V D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 42 | MBERIA Alexander | D V D D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 43 | KICIMAN Leo | D D D V D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 44 | KANNER Cedric | V D D D D | D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
| 45 | SLAVIN Tamir | D V D D D | D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 46 | PUTHOFF Henry | D D D D V D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 47 | ROBERTS Arthur | D D D V D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 48 | ZHOU Zhi Matthew | D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 49 | PURUSHOTHAM Neil | D D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
| 50 | TONG Anson Tin Hang | D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
| 51 | LIN ZIJIE | D D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
| 52 | JERDEE Colton | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.