UWM Sports Complex - Pontiac, MI, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZHAO Olivia | - | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 36% | 16% |
| 2 | KOU Elisha | - | - | 1% | 4% | 18% | 41% | 36% |
| 3 | HU Sophie | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 39% | 44% |
| 3 | TAO Isabella | - | - | 3% | 30% | 60% | 7% | |
| 5 | KIM Audrey | 1% | 6% | 20% | 32% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
| 6 | JAZWINSKI Ivy | - | 2% | 12% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 4% |
| 6 | ZHANG Priscilla | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 53% |
| 8 | KUANG Xiyan | - | 2% | 11% | 26% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
| 9 | CHEN Yinuo | 1% | 10% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 10 | ENRIQUEZ Bianca Perla | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 36% | 23% | 5% |
| 11 | FRASER Morgan | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 41% | 30% |
| 12 | SHAOOLIAN Alexa | 1% | 6% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 13% | 2% |
| 13 | CHOI Evelyn | - | - | - | 2% | 21% | 77% | |
| 14 | CHAN Hailey | - | 4% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 15% | 2% |
| 15 | WU Gloria | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 32% | 15% | 2% |
| 16 | YANG Olivia | - | 2% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 26% | 8% |
| 17 | CULLIVAN Elise | - | 2% | 14% | 37% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 18 | MA Sophia | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 19 | KIM Yuna | 1% | 8% | 22% | 32% | 26% | 10% | 2% |
| 20 | XU Selina (Tai Ran) | - | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 21 | HOM Emma | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 22 | XU Charlene | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
| 23 | KASHUBA Mila | 3% | 18% | 37% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 24 | ZHANG Selina | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 25 | LALONDE Beatrice | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 1% |
| 26 | WELTER Gemma | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
| 27 | IANNI Isabel | - | 1% | 8% | 22% | 34% | 27% | 9% |
| 28 | LU Miaotian | 17% | 37% | 31% | 12% | 3% | - | - |
| 29 | LIU Anya | - | 5% | 26% | 50% | 18% | 1% | |
| 30 | SHI Micah | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 31 | LIU Sophia | 2% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
| 32 | EVOLA Ellie | 17% | 40% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 33 | HEWITT Madison | 5% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 34 | FAROOQI Eliora | 2% | 20% | 52% | 23% | 3% | - | |
| 35 | GANOCY Sloane | 33% | 49% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 36 | SAVIOZ Naomi | - | 3% | 13% | 28% | 32% | 19% | 5% |
| 37 | WANG Christina | 2% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 38 | HUANG Emma | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 39 | LEE Eun-Hae | 2% | 13% | 30% | 32% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 40 | ZEE Bella | 1% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 40 | LIN Megan | 21% | 40% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 42 | JONES Parker | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 43 | MARENITCH Kara | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 44 | FANG Savannah | 16% | 35% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 45 | XU Scarlett | 2% | 12% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 46 | KAGAN Natalie | 4% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 47 | KIM Gia | 6% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 48 | GONG Maggie | 34% | 41% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 48 | JIMÉNEZ PELAY Claudia | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 20% | 1% |
| 50 | KIM Yane | - | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 51 | GARRISON Emersyn | - | 1% | 6% | 27% | 42% | 22% | 2% |
| 52 | YU Reecy | 1% | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 53 | HUANG Cynthia | 36% | 48% | 15% | 1% | - | - | |
| 54 | CAMELLINI Emily | 53% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 55 | ZHENG Skyler | 14% | 33% | 32% | 16% | 4% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.