Georgia Tech CRC - Atlanta, GA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | WALLACE Cade | - | - | 2% | 18% | 56% | 23% | |
2 | PINEDA Gabriel U. | - | - | 5% | 27% | 45% | 23% | |
3 | LISSO Ria A. | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 5% |
3 | JUTRAS Daniel G. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 54% |
5 | HE Cassandra | 4% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
5 | LOGGINS Austin J. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 42% | 30% |
7 | SWETT Isaac B. | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 10% |
8 | JARDIM Kyle A. | - | - | 1% | 11% | 40% | 47% | |
9 | FONZO Ian | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 43% |
10 | NORTON Stephen | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 42% | 32% | |
11 | RICH Jack | - | 1% | 11% | 37% | 43% | 9% | |
12 | JUNG Ho(Daniel) (Daniel) Y. | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
13 | WHEAT Ryun B. | - | - | 3% | 21% | 42% | 29% | 5% |
14 | FANG Zhou | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 3% | |
15 | WEST Matthew S. | 1% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% | - |
16 | VO Khanh D. | 4% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
17 | CHEN Andrew | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
18 | DUNCAN Sarah | 1% | 9% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 4% | |
19 | CROWLEY James | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
20 | FOGARTY Katie | 12% | 42% | 34% | 11% | 2% | - | |
21 | KELLNER Taylor T. | - | - | 1% | 11% | 54% | 31% | 3% |
22 | DAWSON Todd | 1% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
23 | BUCHANAN Tanner | 5% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 7% | 1% | |
25 | RICHERSON James | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
26 | BAKER Matthew | 4% | 22% | 44% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
27 | SU Thalia | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 3% | |
28 | GIRARD Parker | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 6% | - |
29 | YANG Jenny J. | 7% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
30 | MCGOWEN Collin | 1% | 6% | 23% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
31 | LIU Iris | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
32 | WATKINS Christopher M. | 23% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
33 | HOPKINS William | 14% | 37% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - | |
35 | CREVELING Kathryn | 32% | 42% | 21% | 5% | - | - | |
36 | ISKIYAYEV Alexander | 1% | 6% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 6% | |
37 | YU Johnathan | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
40 | JOHNSON Julia F. | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
41 | BOWE Trey | 14% | 38% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | |
42 | CUADRA Oscar | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
43 | FONTANA Julianne | 2% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% | - |
44 | MARAGULOVA Veronika | 10% | 37% | 40% | 12% | 1% | - | |
45 | SEGARD Ian | 6% | 40% | 37% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
46 | OZME R Joseph | 5% | 30% | 42% | 20% | 3% | - | |
47 | TAYLOR Kathleen | 11% | 43% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.