Georgia Tech CRC - Atlanta, GA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | WALLACE Cade | V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
2 | PINEDA Gabriel U. | V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
3 | LISSO Ria A. | V D V V V V | V V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
3 | JUTRAS Daniel G. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
5 | HE Cassandra | D V V V V V | V D | 2.1 | 5 | +2.9 |
5 | LOGGINS Austin J. | V V V D V V | V V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
7 | SWETT Isaac B. | V V V D V V | V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
8 | JARDIM Kyle A. | V D V V V | V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
9 | FONZO Ian | V V D V V V | V D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
10 | NORTON Stephen | D V V V V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
11 | RICH Jack | V V V V D | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
12 | JUNG Ho(Daniel) (Daniel) Y. | V V V V D V | V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
13 | WHEAT Ryun B. | V V V V D V | V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
14 | FANG Zhou | D V D V V | V V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
15 | WEST Matthew S. | V V D D V V | V V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
16 | VO Khanh D. | V D D D D D | V V D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
17 | CHEN Andrew | V V D V V V | D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
18 | DUNCAN Sarah | V V D V V | D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
19 | CROWLEY James | V D V V D V | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
20 | FOGARTY Katie | V D V V D | V D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
21 | KELLNER Taylor T. | V D V V D D | V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
22 | DAWSON Todd | D V D V V D | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
23 | BUCHANAN Tanner | V D V V D | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
25 | RICHERSON James | V D V D V D | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
26 | BAKER Matthew | D D V D V V | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
27 | SU Thalia | D V V D D | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
28 | GIRARD Parker | D V D D V D | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
29 | YANG Jenny J. | D V D D V D | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
30 | MCGOWEN Collin | D D V D V D | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
31 | LIU Iris | D V V D D D | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
32 | WATKINS Christopher M. | D D V D D D | V D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
33 | HOPKINS William | D D V V D | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
35 | CREVELING Kathryn | D D V V D | D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
36 | ISKIYAYEV Alexander | V D D D V | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
37 | YU Johnathan | D D V V D D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
40 | JOHNSON Julia F. | D D D V D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
41 | BOWE Trey | V D D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
42 | CUADRA Oscar | D V D D D D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 | |
43 | FONTANA Julianne | D D D D D V | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
44 | MARAGULOVA Veronika | D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
45 | SEGARD Ian | D D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
46 | OZME R Joseph | D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
47 | TAYLOR Kathleen | D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.