UWM Sports Complex - Pontiac, MI, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HUANG Kenneth | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 33% | 59% |
| 2 | MEHROTRA Neel | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 37% |
| 3 | DODIN Daniel M. | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 42% | 36% |
| 3 | CHEN Jayden | - | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 41% | 19% |
| 5 | KIM Gene | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 41% | 21% |
| 6 | CHEN Isaac Zhi | - | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 33% | 9% |
| 7 | CHO Alex | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% |
| 8 | KICIMAN Leo | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
| 9 | CAFASSO Alexander | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
| 10 | KROPP Wesley | - | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 35% | 16% |
| 11 | TOWNSHEND Connor | - | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 12 | ZHANG jonathan | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 30% | 10% |
| 13 | SONG Aidan | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 3% |
| 14 | HUANG Max | 3% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 15 | PUTHOFF Henry | - | 4% | 15% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 3% |
| 16 | PETERS Keane | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
| 17 | DANG William | - | 3% | 13% | 28% | 32% | 19% | 4% |
| 18 | GRIGORENKO Gleb E. | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 19 | ZHOU Zhi Matthew | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 20 | HONG Daniel | 3% | 15% | 30% | 31% | 17% | 5% | - |
| 21 | LIU Andrew | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 7% |
| 22 | LIN ZIJIE | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 23 | CAMP William | 6% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 24 | TONG Anson Tin Hang | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 25 | HERDMAN Julian | - | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 26 | GOODMAN Liam | 3% | 18% | 34% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 27 | ROBERTS Arthur | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 38% | 21% | 3% |
| 28 | PURUSHOTHAM Neil | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 29 | HANTOV Adrian | - | 11% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 30 | SOLOMON Aryeh | 2% | 10% | 25% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 31 | SLAVIN Tamir | 11% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 32 | MA yuwei | 12% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 33 | KRAVCHENKO Philip | 19% | 39% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 34 | CHEN Benjamin | 36% | 42% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 35 | PERRY Noah | 1% | 13% | 34% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 36 | MBERIA Henry | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 37 | CHEN Linus | 19% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 38 | MA Joseph | 22% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 39 | MARZOUK Moustafa | 85% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 40 | GOLDBERG Simon | 12% | 32% | 33% | 17% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 41 | SONG Sawyer | 12% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 42 | SHARMA Sahaj | 7% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.