UWM Sports Complex - Pontiac, MI, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | HUANG Kenneth | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
| 2 | MEHROTRA Neel | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
| 3 | DODIN Daniel M. | V V V V D D | V V V D | 5.1 | 4 | -1.1 |
| 3 | CHEN Jayden | V V V D V V | V V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 5 | KIM Gene | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
| 6 | CHEN Isaac Zhi | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.2 | 6 | +1.8 |
| 7 | CHO Alex | V V D V V V | V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 8 | KICIMAN Leo | D V V V V V | V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 9 | CAFASSO Alexander | V D V V V V | V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 10 | KROPP Wesley | V V V V V D | V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 11 | TOWNSHEND Connor | V D V V V D | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 12 | ZHANG jonathan | D V V V V D | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 13 | SONG Aidan | D V V V D V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 14 | HUANG Max | V V D D D V | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 15 | PUTHOFF Henry | D V V V D D | V V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 16 | PETERS Keane | V D D V V D | V V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 17 | DANG William | V V V D V V | D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 18 | GRIGORENKO Gleb E. | V V V D V V | D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
| 19 | ZHOU Zhi Matthew | D V V D V V | D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 20 | HONG Daniel | V V D V D V | D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 21 | LIU Andrew | V V V V D D | D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 22 | LIN ZIJIE | V V D V V D | D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 23 | CAMP William | D D D V V V | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 24 | TONG Anson Tin Hang | D D V D V V | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 25 | HERDMAN Julian | D V D V D D | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 26 | GOODMAN Liam | V D D D V D | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 27 | ROBERTS Arthur | V V D D D D | V D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
| 28 | PURUSHOTHAM Neil | D D D D V V | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 29 | HANTOV Adrian | D D V D D V | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 30 | SOLOMON Aryeh | D D D D V D | V D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
| 31 | SLAVIN Tamir | D D D D D V | V D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 32 | MA yuwei | D D V D D D | V D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 33 | KRAVCHENKO Philip | D D D V D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 34 | CHEN Benjamin | D D V D D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 35 | PERRY Noah | D V D D D D | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 36 | MBERIA Henry | V D D D D D | D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
| 37 | CHEN Linus | D D D V D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 38 | MA Joseph | D D D D D V | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 39 | MARZOUK Moustafa | D D D D D V | D | 0.2 | 1 | +0.8 |
| 40 | GOLDBERG Simon | D D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
| 41 | SONG Sawyer | D D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
| 42 | SHARMA Sahaj | D D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.