Birmingham Jefferson Convention Complex - Birmingham, AL, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | ZHAO Adam | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
2 | TANG Alexander L. | V V V D V V | V V V V V D | 5.3 | 5 | -0.3 |
3 | PARRISH Evan | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
3 | MAZAHERI Fletcher | V V D D V V | V V V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
5 | VADEN Oliver | V V V V V V | V V | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
5 | DOELL Ethan | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
7 | YOON Junhyeok | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
8 | SHENG Dalton | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
9 | RAJ Jay | V D V V V V | V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
10 | MARISI Gabriel | V V V V V D | V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
11 | BOESKIN Nolan | D V V V V V | V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
12 | ZHAO Nathan | D V V V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
13 | FEDELI Francesco | V V V V V D | V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
14 | QIAN Zekai | D V D V V V | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
15 | GE Felix Fei | V V D V V D | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
16 | PARK Andrew | D V V V D V | V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
17 | PARKER Isaiah | D V V V V V | D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
18 | HUYNH Matthew | V V V V V D | V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
19 | LIM EUNSEONG | V D V V V V | V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
20 | KIM Gene | V V V V D V | V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
21 | XU Nathan | V D D V V V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
22 | WANG Elijah (QiChen) | V V V V D D | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
23 | SHAW Spencer | V D D V V V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
23 | JIN Xuechong Daniel | D V D V V V | V D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
25 | SUSANTO William | D V D V V V | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
26 | FANG Haoyu | D D V V D V | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
27 | SLAIN Owen | D V V D D V | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
28 | MARTIRE Luca | V D V D V D | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
29 | LIU Alex | D V V V D D | V | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
30 | PAN Ethan | V D D V D V | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
31 | BARRERA Marcelo | D V D V D D | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
32 | DHOKTE Neev | V V D D D D | V D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
33 | LATORRE Leonardo | V V D V D D | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
34 | YOU Chanmin | V V V D D D | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
35 | JOHNSON Soren | D D V D V V | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
36 | CHIANG Aiden | V V D D D D | D | 0.8 | 2 | +1.2 |
37 | ROBERTSON Liam | D V D D D V | D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
38 | GRIGORYAN Erik | D D V D D V | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
39 | LEE Aeden | D D D V V D | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
40 | CAO Kellen | D D D D D V | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
41 | LI Jayden | D V D D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
42 | KIM Andrew | D V D D D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
43 | ZENG Albert | V D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
44 | REBNER Parker | D D D D V D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
45 | MARTIN Sullivan | D D D D V D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
46 | MAZAHERI John | D D D D V D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
47 | GOGOI Kavi | D D D D D V | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
47 | SIGGINS Wally | D D D V D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
49 | CHIU Vincent | D D D V D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
50 | LEE Junehyuk | D D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
51 | SU Daniel | D D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
52 | PFRENGER Sebastian | D D D D D D | D | 2.6 | 0 | -2.6 |
53 | KARLEKAR Ved | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
54 | DRAKE Davis | D D D D D D | D | 2.4 | 0 | -2.4 |
55 | MARTIN Julian | D D D D D D | D | 2.5 | 0 | -2.5 |
56 | PATEL Aarav | D D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.