Birmingham Jefferson Convention Complex - Birmingham, AL, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MAZAHERI Fletcher | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 42% |
| 2 | FEDELI Francesco | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 42% | 40% |
| 3 | KIM Gene | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 43% | 23% | |
| 3 | SHIN Noah | - | - | 4% | 21% | 46% | 28% | |
| 5 | DOELL Ethan | - | - | - | - | 4% | 27% | 69% |
| 6 | GE Felix Fei | - | - | 2% | 17% | 46% | 34% | |
| 7 | LIM EUNSEONG | - | - | 2% | 13% | 37% | 38% | 10% |
| 8 | WU Gengze (Daniel) | 1% | 8% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 9 | PAN Ethan | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 38% | |
| 10 | XU Nathan | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 6% |
| 11 | SLAIN Owen | - | 2% | 9% | 27% | 38% | 21% | 2% |
| 12 | FANG Haoyu | - | - | 1% | 12% | 43% | 43% | |
| 13 | HUYNH Matthew | - | - | 5% | 26% | 46% | 23% | |
| 14 | ZHAO Nathan | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 41% | 36% |
| 15 | QIAN Zekai | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 16 | LATORRE Leonardo | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 15% | |
| 17 | WANG Elijah (QiChen) | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% | |
| 18 | CHANG Parker | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 38% | 12% | |
| 19 | LIU Alex | - | - | 5% | 27% | 48% | 20% | |
| 20 | PARK Andrew | - | - | 4% | 21% | 41% | 28% | 5% |
| 21 | SIU Max | 2% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 22 | JIN Xueyuan George | - | 5% | 29% | 44% | 19% | 3% | |
| 23 | ZENG Albert | 1% | 5% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 24 | ZHAI Derrick | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 6% |
| 25 | ARORA Maximilian Andras A. | 7% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 26 | JIN Xuechong Daniel | 1% | 10% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 27 | CHIANG Aiden | 8% | 35% | 40% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 28 | BAIER Leon | 35% | 48% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 29 | HUANG Dalynn | - | 4% | 27% | 42% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 30 | QIAN Henry | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 3% |
| 31 | DANTON Ryan | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
| 32 | LI Jayden | 1% | 8% | 33% | 39% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 33 | KIM Andrew | 3% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 12% | 2% | |
| 34 | MAZAHERI John | 2% | 13% | 32% | 36% | 16% | 2% | |
| 35 | HOFFMAN Zane | 12% | 38% | 36% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 36 | HOARE Gabriel | 5% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 6% | - | |
| 37 | LEE Aeden | 10% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 38 | SUSANTO William | - | 5% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 39 | DIFRANK Avery | - | 5% | 23% | 44% | 24% | 4% | |
| 40 | NEMI Vin | 7% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 41 | JORGE Elijah | 1% | 7% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% | |
| 42 | KOVACH Graham | 20% | 44% | 29% | 6% | - | - | |
| 43 | MAZAHERI Theodore | 6% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 44 | LI Andrew | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 45 | SCHWARTZ David | 1% | 12% | 39% | 36% | 11% | 1% | |
| 46 | LIU Runze | 11% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 47 | SIEBENALER Trevon | 1% | 15% | 38% | 34% | 11% | 1% | |
| 48 | GRIGORYAN Erik | 21% | 39% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 49 | REBNER Parker | 20% | 44% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 50 | KUTATELADZE Danieli | 43% | 45% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 51 | LIANG Andrew | 31% | 52% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 52 | ROBERTSON Liam | 34% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 53 | MORRISON Archer | 26% | 43% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 54 | CHUNG Royce | 20% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 54 | PATEL Aarav | 23% | 45% | 27% | 5% | - | - | |
| 54 | PHILIPP John | 44% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
| 57 | CHIU Vincent | 32% | 45% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 58 | HU Anthony | 18% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.