Birmingham Jefferson Convention Complex - Birmingham, AL, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | BROWN Lola | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 17% |
2 | PARK Lina | - | - | - | 5% | 29% | 66% | |
3 | DENG Melissa | - | - | - | - | 4% | 27% | 69% |
3 | WONG Angellena | - | - | 1% | 13% | 42% | 44% | |
5 | SHMUKLER Maria | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% |
6 | MARISI Gianna | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 57% |
7 | LIU Samantha | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 4% |
8 | PARK Zena | - | - | 5% | 24% | 48% | 22% | |
9 | HAFEZ Tahiyah | - | - | 2% | 13% | 44% | 41% | |
10 | YACOBUCCI Nadia | - | 2% | 22% | 44% | 27% | 4% | |
11 | CHERNYKH Elina | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% |
12 | ALKADI Mai | 1% | 12% | 34% | 37% | 15% | 1% | |
13 | PINEDA jade luna | - | - | 5% | 25% | 42% | 25% | 3% |
14 | LI Olivia | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 23% | 6% | - |
15 | WU Chingfei Amber | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 35% | 15% | 2% |
16 | CHOI JULIE | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
17 | KATS Ekaterina | 3% | 21% | 40% | 28% | 7% | - | |
17 | LEE Jeemin | - | 6% | 38% | 40% | 14% | 1% | |
19 | WATSON Evelyn | 3% | 18% | 39% | 31% | 8% | 1% | |
20 | SINGH Evangelina | 1% | 14% | 44% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
21 | RIEGERT-JOHNSON Simone | - | - | 6% | 28% | 42% | 21% | 2% |
22 | WANG Dina C. | - | 1% | 10% | 34% | 39% | 15% | 1% |
23 | ZOLDAN Gweniveve A. | - | 5% | 21% | 40% | 29% | 4% | |
24 | BAULIN Zoya | 12% | 38% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - | |
25 | CHU Felicity | 33% | 54% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
26 | HU Sophie | 8% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | 1% | - |
27 | WANG Sophia | - | 1% | 10% | 36% | 42% | 12% | |
28 | GE Lena Lan | 3% | 19% | 40% | 30% | 7% | 1% | |
29 | SHAOOLIAN Maya | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
30 | LIU Elinda | 1% | 12% | 32% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
31 | KUTATELADZE Anna | 35% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
32 | OWEN Alexandra | 49% | 44% | 7% | - | - | - | |
33 | HAFEZ Sahar | 6% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
34 | HUSSIAN Annabelle | 4% | 26% | 41% | 24% | 5% | - | |
35 | HALLER Naomi | 53% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
36 | DUVVA Sanika | 37% | 42% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
37 | YOTHER Anna | 24% | 52% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
38 | KIM Alison | 45% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
39 | SCHWARTZ Sophie | 52% | 41% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.