Birmingham Jefferson Convention Complex - Birmingham, AL, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | BROWN Lola | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 54% | 17% |
2 | PARK Lina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 66% | |
3 | DENG Melissa | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 69% |
3 | WONG Angellena | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 44% | |
5 | SHMUKLER Maria | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 8% |
6 | MARISI Gianna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 57% |
7 | LIU Samantha | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 28% | 4% |
8 | PARK Zena | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 22% | |
9 | HAFEZ Tahiyah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 41% | |
10 | YACOBUCCI Nadia | 100% | 100% | 98% | 76% | 32% | 4% | |
11 | CHERNYKH Elina | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 5% |
12 | ALKADI Mai | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 16% | 1% | |
13 | PINEDA jade luna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 28% | 3% |
14 | LI Olivia | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 30% | 7% | - |
15 | WU Chingfei Amber | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 17% | 2% |
16 | CHOI JULIE | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
17 | KATS Ekaterina | 100% | 97% | 76% | 35% | 7% | - | |
17 | LEE Jeemin | 100% | 100% | 93% | 55% | 15% | 1% | |
19 | WATSON Evelyn | 100% | 97% | 79% | 40% | 9% | 1% | |
20 | SINGH Evangelina | 100% | 99% | 85% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - |
21 | RIEGERT-JOHNSON Simone | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 65% | 23% | 2% |
22 | WANG Dina C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 55% | 17% | 1% |
23 | ZOLDAN Gweniveve A. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 33% | 4% | |
24 | BAULIN Zoya | 100% | 88% | 49% | 14% | 2% | - | |
25 | CHU Felicity | 100% | 67% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
26 | HU Sophie | 100% | 92% | 59% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
27 | WANG Sophia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 54% | 12% | |
28 | GE Lena Lan | 100% | 97% | 78% | 38% | 8% | 1% | |
29 | SHAOOLIAN Maya | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - |
30 | LIU Elinda | 100% | 99% | 86% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
31 | KUTATELADZE Anna | 100% | 65% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
32 | OWEN Alexandra | 100% | 51% | 7% | - | - | - | |
33 | HAFEZ Sahar | 100% | 94% | 66% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
34 | HUSSIAN Annabelle | 100% | 96% | 71% | 30% | 6% | - | |
35 | HALLER Naomi | 100% | 47% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
36 | DUVVA Sanika | 100% | 63% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
37 | YOTHER Anna | 100% | 76% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - |
38 | KIM Alison | 100% | 55% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
39 | SCHWARTZ Sophie | 100% | 48% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.