Jump Beyond Sports - Torrance, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DU Evan | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 31% | 62% |
| 2 | WU Nathan | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 39% | 50% |
| 3 | WONG Kyle | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 48% |
| 3 | YOO Lucas | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 39% |
| 5 | HWANG Matthew | - | 1% | 4% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 9% |
| 6 | ZHAO Luke | - | 1% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
| 7 | LIU Aiden | - | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 35% | 16% |
| 8 | MA kevin | - | 3% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 5% |
| 9 | LEE Lucas | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 27% | 8% |
| 10 | LIU Yihong | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 6% |
| 11 | SUN Jiarui (Jerry) | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 14% | 1% |
| 12 | TENG Eric | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 13 | ZHANG JENSON | - | - | 2% | 11% | 33% | 41% | 12% |
| 14 | LI Vance | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 9% | 1% |
| 15 | LIU Zihao | 1% | 12% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 16 | YI Alexander | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 3% |
| 17 | KIM Benjamin | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 18 | WANG Ryan | - | 5% | 18% | 32% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 18 | TIAN Dylan | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 20 | FU Benjamin | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 21 | YANG XINRUI | 3% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 22 | WON Jacob | 5% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 23 | LU Jayden | 4% | 21% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 24 | WANG Sean | - | 2% | 9% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 7% |
| 25 | LI Ethan | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 26 | LIU Zeyar | - | 5% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 9% | 1% |
| 27 | PARK Sean | 1% | 8% | 26% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 28 | LI Connor | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% |
| 29 | CHU Clayton | 6% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 30 | BAEK Joel | 7% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 31 | SHENG BEN | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 32 | YANG Rony | 14% | 34% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 33 | HONG Eason | 1% | 7% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 34 | DUCOURNAU Enzo | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 35 | SI Alexander | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 36 | GOMEZ Emmett | 9% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 5% | - | - |
| 37 | YOON Ian | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 38 | TU William | 63% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 39 | LEE Daniel | 20% | 38% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 40 | LI nathan zeting | 24% | 40% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 41 | ZHAO Jonathan Li | 18% | 39% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 42 | KOU Logan | 33% | 42% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.