Jump Beyond Sports - Torrance, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DU Evan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 62% |
| 2 | WU Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 50% |
| 3 | WONG Kyle | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 48% |
| 3 | YOO Lucas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 39% |
| 5 | HWANG Matthew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 42% | 9% |
| 6 | ZHAO Luke | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 27% | 5% |
| 7 | LIU Aiden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 16% |
| 8 | MA kevin | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 58% | 24% | 5% |
| 9 | LEE Lucas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 35% | 8% |
| 10 | LIU Yihong | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 33% | 6% |
| 11 | SUN Jiarui (Jerry) | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 15% | 1% |
| 12 | TENG Eric | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 13 | ZHANG JENSON | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 53% | 12% |
| 14 | LI Vance | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
| 15 | LIU Zihao | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 16 | YI Alexander | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 27% | 3% |
| 17 | KIM Benjamin | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 18 | WANG Ryan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 45% | 16% | 2% |
| 18 | TIAN Dylan | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 20 | FU Benjamin | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 35% | 8% | 1% |
| 21 | YANG XINRUI | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 22 | WON Jacob | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 23 | LU Jayden | 100% | 96% | 75% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 24 | WANG Sean | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 31% | 7% |
| 25 | LI Ethan | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 26 | LIU Zeyar | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 10% | 1% |
| 27 | PARK Sean | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 28 | LI Connor | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 22% | 4% |
| 29 | CHU Clayton | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 30 | BAEK Joel | 100% | 93% | 63% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 31 | SHENG BEN | 100% | 92% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 32 | YANG Rony | 100% | 86% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 33 | HONG Eason | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
| 34 | DUCOURNAU Enzo | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 35 | SI Alexander | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 36 | GOMEZ Emmett | 100% | 91% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 37 | YOON Ian | 100% | 92% | 64% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 38 | TU William | 100% | 37% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 39 | LEE Daniel | 100% | 80% | 43% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 40 | LI nathan zeting | 100% | 76% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 41 | ZHAO Jonathan Li | 100% | 82% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 42 | KOU Logan | 100% | 67% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.