The Fencing Center - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LEE Natasha | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 52% |
| 2 | CHANG Celine A. | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 4% |
| 3 | LAN Alice S. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 38% | |
| 3 | LIANG Jingjing | - | - | 4% | 17% | 38% | 34% | 7% |
| 5 | XU Serena | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
| 6 | VERA Kalista R. | - | - | - | 5% | 20% | 42% | 33% |
| 7 | HUANG Lanlan | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 2% |
| 8 | LEE Camilla | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% |
| 9 | ZMURK Emma M. | - | - | - | - | 6% | 33% | 61% |
| 10 | LIN Ashley | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% |
| 11 | HEPLER Sarah | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 5% |
| 12 | SALISTRA Emilia | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 13 | SHARMA Sanvi | - | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 14 | CHIEM Karen | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
| 15 | HOFMAN Haejung | - | < 1% | 3% | 13% | 32% | 36% | 16% |
| 16 | DUONG Zoey | < 1% | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 17% | 2% |
| 17 | DAYAL Saahira | - | 6% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 18 | DALEY Keira | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% | |
| 19 | HANSEN Kira | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 27% |
| 20 | MONTOYA Kimberlee C. | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 43% | 40% |
| 21 | ENRILE Erica | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 22 | MARTYNOVA Diana | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
| 23 | PHUKAN Indra | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
| 24 | PRIMES Amanda M. | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% | - |
| 25 | LAI Amanda | - | 5% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 26 | CHIOU-WILLIAMS Matea | 1% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 27 | PANT Anisha | - | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 28 | MITTMAN Lela Z. | 1% | 7% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 29 | BURICEA Ada | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 30 | BLOOMER Suzanne | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% |
| 31 | LYNCH Kristin A. | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 13% | 2% |
| 32 | YIN Gabriela | 3% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 33 | MONTOYA Amy C. | - | 1% | 10% | 28% | 37% | 20% | 4% |
| 34 | ZHUANG Lauren | - | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 35 | BHATT Anisha | - | 3% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 36 | SCHULTZ Nomi | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 37 | CHANG Heidi | - | - | 2% | 10% | 32% | 41% | 15% |
| 38 | COHEN Shaina | 27% | 43% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 39 | JAMES Ashley | 5% | 39% | 38% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 40 | LIN ariel | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
| 41 | RASMUSSEN Ashelee | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 9% | |
| 42 | XU Celina | 5% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 43 | AIRES Julia | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 44 | CHIRASHNYA Mika | 1% | 24% | 40% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 45 | MADRID Maureen | 4% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 46 | RADOV Una | 44% | 40% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 47 | CHUNG Penelope | 18% | 38% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 48 | OBENCHAIN Janel | - | < 1% | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 12% |
| 49 | LEE Emily | 10% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 50 | BUCA Nora | 16% | 39% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 51 | KANDALA Aanya | 31% | 42% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 52 | EYUNNI Vibha | 61% | 32% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 53 | JAIN Aashi | 92% | 8% | - | - | - | - | - |
| 54 | JAIN Prisha | 79% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 55 | NAZARENKO Sasha | 95% | 5% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.