The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Mission SYC

Y-14 Men's Saber

Sunday, May 5, 2019 at 3:30 PM

Rocky Point, NY - Rocky Point, NY, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 LIU kelly 100% 99% 90% 60% 23% 3%
2 LIN John A. 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 89% 51%
3 WOOD Elden S. 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 69% 27%
3 LINSKY Matthew 100% 100% 100% 100% 94% 71% 28%
5 FRISHMAN Ethan J. 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 61%
6 SILBERZWEIG Jordan H. 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 85% 44%
7 YUAN Kevin 100% 100% 97% 77% 40% 11% 1%
8 WIND Nicky E. 100% 100% 100% 99% 90% 59% 16%
9 WOLFE-MCGUIRE George T. 100% 100% 100% 98% 83% 45% 9%
10 CHAN Alexander S. 100% 100% 99% 91% 62% 23% 3%
11 LUKASHENKO Darii 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 64% 23%
12 CHENG Kyle 100% 97% 77% 40% 12% 2% -
13 NAZLYMOV Andrei 100% 100% 97% 79% 39% 6%
14 CHON Taylor A. 100% 99% 87% 54% 19% 3%
15 CZYZEWSKI Konrad R. 100% 100% 100% 98% 80% 34%
16 ZHOU Kevin 100% 99% 92% 67% 30% 5%
17 KIM Avery J. 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 79% 36%
18 GINIS Nathan 100% 100% 100% 95% 70% 23%
19 CHIN Matthew W. 100% 100% 96% 79% 44% 11%
20 ALTIRS Alexander 100% 96% 77% 43% 14% 2% -
21 SIMAK Joseph P. 100% 100% 99% 94% 72% 34% 5%
22 HO Kaden M. 100% 97% 79% 45% 16% 3% -
23 ZHOU Miles 100% 100% 94% 55% 14% 1%
24 SKINNER Graham B. 100% 100% 100% 95% 77% 40% 8%
25 BERMAN Luca 100% 100% 100% 94% 71% 29% 4%
26 EDELMAN Seth A. 100% 99% 84% 46% 13% 2% -
27 CHAN Matthew 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 66% 26%
28 SHIRPAL Oleksandr 100% 100% 99% 89% 60% 20%
29 NOBLE Colin 100% 100% 94% 65% 26% 5% -
30 SHTEYN Mark 100% 100% 97% 78% 40% 10% 1%
31 MYLEK Peter 100% 100% 98% 84% 48% 12%
32 GEORGE Daniel 100% 90% 49% 12% 1% - -
33 KEEFE Duncan 100% 100% 99% 87% 55% 20% 3%
34 WILSON Jude 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 81% 38%
35 KOGAN Benjamin 100% 100% 100% 97% 78% 40% 8%
36 BERRIO Carter E. 100% 100% 100% 97% 78% 40% 8%
37 SO Hananiah 100% 100% 100% 98% 82% 33%
38 LEE Justin 100% 100% 95% 74% 38% 10% 1%
39 WU Wilmund 100% 98% 82% 47% 15% 2% -
40 GOLD Jackson 100% 97% 78% 42% 12% 1%
41 OH Triton 100% 94% 64% 21% 3% -
42 MORRILL Justin 100% 100% 99% 90% 65% 30% 6%
43 KUSHKOV Veniamin 100% 100% 100% 97% 82% 46% 11%
44 OVERDECK Andrew 100% 90% 58% 23% 5% - -
45 HUANG Tyler T. 100% 100% 96% 77% 43% 13% 1%
46 LUTHRA Arjun 100% 100% 100% 96% 79% 45% 11%
47 BONIFIELD Arthur G. 100% 100% 98% 86% 59% 24% 4%
48 BELEV Nicholas 100% 97% 68% 23% 4% - -
49 HUANG Ethan F. 100% 100% 100% 97% 75% 33% 5%
50 CHENG Cody 100% 96% 69% 27% 5% - -
51 CHAUDHURI Eeshaan A. 100% 99% 88% 58% 23% 5% -
52 MCCARTHY Gabriel 100% 99% 93% 70% 34% 8% -
52 MARGULIES William 100% 94% 64% 25% 5% - -
54 DEISBOECK Maximilian S. 100% 100% 98% 74% 30% 4%
55 DA GRACA Aidan 100% 99% 87% 57% 21% 3%
56 JARAMILLO Tobias L. 100% 100% 99% 93% 70% 28%
57 OWENS Harrison J. 100% 97% 75% 37% 10% 1%
58 GILSON Lucas B. 100% 100% 98% 85% 51% 16% 2%
59 SHTEIN Yan 100% 100% 93% 69% 33% 8% 1%
60 HAN Daniel Y. 100% 89% 47% 10% 1% - -
61 FENG Leo 100% 100% 96% 79% 47% 16% 2%
62 MORALES Jonathan 100% 99% 92% 69% 32% 7% -
63 NOURELDIN Gabriel 100% 100% 98% 85% 46% 12% 1%
64 CHIEN Winston L. 100% 99% 87% 55% 20% 4% -
65 ZENG Noah 100% 89% 52% 16% 2% -
66 YU Thomas 100% 97% 79% 44% 14% 2% -
67 ZHENG Edward L. 100% 100% 96% 77% 43% 13% 2%
68 ALTIRS Giorgio 100% 64% 23% 4% - -
69 SULLIVAN Aidan J. 100% 96% 73% 35% 9% 1%
69 LIU Mingyang Ryan 100% 48% 11% 1% - -
71 GIORDANO Nicholas 100% 78% 17% 1% - -
72 MAKLIN Edward P. 100% 100% 95% 78% 45% 15% 2%
73 WEBER Mattias A. 100% 99% 85% 48% 13% 1% -
74 MCCARTHY Devan 100% 25% 1% - - - -
75 BARTESKI Henry J. 100% 94% 63% 25% 5% - -
75 MEDVEDEV Michail D. 100% 68% 27% 6% 1% - -
77 BELLUCCI Nicholas 100% 44% 7% 1% - - -
78 HUANG Maxwell H. 100% 99% 88% 57% 22% 4% -
79 NAZAROV Adilzhan 100% 48% 10% 1% - - -
80 LEUNG Andrew K. 100% 39% 7% 1% - - -
80 MOULTON Ian 100% 41% 8% 1% - - -
83 KESSLER Josh 100% 61% 19% 3% - -
84 ENG Craig 100% 78% 37% 9% 1% - -
85 CUSUMANO Neal 100% 79% 23% 3% - - -
86 HYMES Matthew 100% 40% 6% - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.