University of Tennessee HPER Building - Knoxville, TN, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WOODLEY Colin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 62% |
| 2 | MUNLIN Donovan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 64% |
| 3 | OLIVERIUS Joseph W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 67% |
| 3 | TOUSSAINT Semaj | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 34% | |
| 5 | BARTLETT Lauren | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 6 | ZOOK Evan D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 79% | 24% | |
| 7 | LEE Aaron | 100% | 99% | 85% | 51% | 17% | 2% | |
| 8 | BETTS Jr Anthony P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 55% | 9% |
| 9 | REYNOLDS Jay T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 36% | 6% |
| 10 | PETE Landon | 100% | 100% | 91% | 55% | 10% | - | |
| 11 | DEMAREE Adam | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 15% | 1% |
| 12 | HARDISON Terry (Reno) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 37% | 5% | |
| 13 | LIM Joshua | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 42% | |
| 14 | WALLACE George | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 38% | |
| 15 | CRAIG Alexander | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 40% | 8% | - |
| 16 | HAUSER Samuel | 100% | 96% | 57% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 17 | BEDWORTH Paige | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 31% | 3% | |
| 18 | DEEL Hayes | 100% | 97% | 77% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 19 | PAYNE John T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 73% | 26% | 2% |
| 20 | DONGES Anna | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% | |
| 21 | EDWARDS Tim | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 47% | |
| 22 | HAYES Zackery | 100% | 86% | 42% | 6% | - | - | |
| 23 | TUCKER Evan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 31% | 5% | - |
| 24 | BABBITT Phoenix | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 10% | 1% |
| 25 | GILL Anhad | 100% | 93% | 48% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 26 | BYRNSIDE Caleb | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 27 | PUVALOWSKI Ryan | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 28 | KINDEL Amara | 100% | 85% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 29 | PARKER Jordan | 100% | 68% | 21% | 2% | - | - | |
| 30 | SEATON Jake | 100% | 99% | 78% | 29% | 3% | - | |
| 31 | KARRIEM Zainuddin | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 32 | PIERCE Marcia M. | 100% | 92% | 63% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
| 33 | SKAGGS Jacob | 100% | 80% | 33% | 4% | - | - | |
| 34 | PACK Josh | 100% | 74% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 35 | BARRETT John | 100% | 52% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 36 | SPAULDING Maleah | 100% | 23% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 37 | PLANAS Ethan | 100% | 92% | 59% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 38 | BULLER Chloe | 100% | 47% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 39 | ADAMS Brianna | 100% | 89% | 48% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.