Energy Sport Club - Niles, IL, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | DESERANNO Leander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 79% |
2 | GE Felix Fei | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% |
3 | FANG Haoyu | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 64% | |
3 | LATORRE Leonardo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 51% | |
5 | TAN Charlie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 55% | |
6 | ZHOU Justin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 30% | |
7 | CRONK Trevor | 100% | 99% | 83% | 42% | 10% | 1% | |
8 | ZHAO Jason | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 28% | 5% | |
9 | GREULICH Nikolas | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 7% | |
10 | SYMMANK Callen | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 35% | 7% | |
11 | LINEBERRY CADEN | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 18% | |
12 | KAGAN Noah | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 49% | 8% | |
13 | XU Jason | 100% | 98% | 81% | 46% | 13% | 1% | |
14 | MORALES Tycho | 100% | 97% | 74% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - |
15 | ZHANG Hanson | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 20% | 2% | |
16 | ENCISO Simon | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 22% | 2% |
17 | CHASE Crosby | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 8% | |
18 | FOSTERVOLD Castiel | 100% | 97% | 75% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
19 | NG Gavin | 100% | 97% | 77% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - |
20 | KALINA Levi | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 20% | 2% | |
21 | THEKKEL Jonathan | 100% | 97% | 78% | 37% | 8% | - | |
22 | FLOOD Moe | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 25% | 2% |
23 | PAYNE Lynas | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 33% | 5% | |
24 | MCGRATH Milo | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 39% | 6% | |
25 | ALVA Anmol | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 26% | 3% |
26 | BILLIET Greyson | 100% | 83% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - | |
27 | MARTIN Wesley | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 16% | 1% | |
28 | HARDWICK Alex | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 12% | 1% | |
29 | HANLEY Jack | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 22% | 2% |
30 | LI Andy | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 16% | 2% | |
31 | HALLETTMANES Ezra | 100% | 78% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | |
32 | MCCOOL Henry | 100% | 88% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | |
33 | DENG Albert | 100% | 83% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
34 | WILSON Jacob | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 29% | 5% | - |
35 | HYUN Francis | 100% | 76% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | |
36 | HOLMES Elston | 100% | 23% | 2% | - | - | - | |
37 | SHAH Aadi | 100% | 74% | 29% | 5% | - | - | |
38 | HILDEBRANDT Gerhard | 100% | 94% | 66% | 28% | 6% | - | |
39 | WANG Freyr | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 34% | 7% | - |
40 | RITTER Nathan D. | 100% | 76% | 32% | 6% | - | - | |
41 | ZUIDEMA Harrison | 100% | 64% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
42 | STAMPS Jasper | 100% | 97% | 56% | 16% | 2% | - | |
43 | ALTENHOF Nathaniel | 100% | 69% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
43 | LUND Jonah | 100% | 52% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.