The Fencing Center - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LEVENTAL Mark | - | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 12% |
| 2 | WU Steven | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 9% | |
| 3 | KUO Rylan | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 21% |
| 3 | MORIN-JIANG Jake | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 13% | |
| 5 | ROBINSON Samuel | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 40% | 17% | |
| 6 | WONG Preston | - | 4% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 7% | |
| 7 | WU Eric | - | 2% | 15% | 37% | 35% | 11% | |
| 8 | PIVOVAROV Lucas | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 9% | |
| 9 | COLLINS Kaden | 45% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - | < 1% | - |
| 10 | PRAKASH Hari | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% | |
| 11 | CHENG Trevor | 2% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 1% | |
| 12 | YUEN Nathan | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 35% |
| 13 | KLINKNER Richard | - | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 1% |
| 14 | XU Yanwen | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% |
| 15 | WONG Ethan | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 8% |
| 16 | CHEW Aedan | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 17 | GUO Woody | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 4% | < 1% |
| 18 | SIM Ian | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 40% | 16% | |
| 19 | HINTON Evan | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 5% | |
| 20 | MCNAMARA Scott | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 38% | 18% |
| 21 | CHAUDHURI Kabir | 2% | 15% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 22 | CLAES Thomas | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% | |
| 23 | JOHAR Manvik | 17% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - | |
| 24 | LOMIO Nicholas A. | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 9% | |
| 25 | RUFANOV Maxim | 3% | 20% | 37% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 26 | BHARGAV Angad | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
| 27 | KOERBER Christopher T. | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 32% | |
| 28 | CHANG Kristopher | 49% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 29 | LOGUE Paul | 4% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
| 29 | ZHAO Qinglin | - | 4% | 21% | 41% | 28% | 5% | |
| 31 | COHEN Joshua | 2% | 15% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 32 | MARTIN Zachary | 54% | 38% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
| 33 | LI Sean | 20% | 53% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
| 34 | CAMPBELL Kenneth | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% |
| 35 | DUONG John | 9% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 36 | LOUIE Joseph | 1% | 13% | 35% | 35% | 14% | 2% | |
| 37 | CHENG Zijun | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
| 38 | CHAUDHARY Rohan | 39% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 39 | BAUMAN Colin | 37% | 41% | 18% | 4% | - | - | |
| 40 | BHATT Arjun | - | 8% | 33% | 39% | 17% | 3% | |
| 41 | KUO Michael | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
| 42 | MITCHEM Paolo | 31% | 42% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 43 | TALATAM Arnav | 13% | 42% | 33% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 44 | PEARSON Steven A. | 9% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 45 | PLOSCARU Matthew | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.