The Fencing Center - San Jose, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | LEVENTAL Mark | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.3 | 6 | +1.7 |
| 2 | WU Steven | V V V D V | V V V V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 3 | KUO Rylan | V V V D D V | V V V D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
| 3 | MORIN-JIANG Jake | D V V V V | V V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 5 | ROBINSON Samuel | V V V D V | V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 6 | WONG Preston | V V D V D | V V V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 7 | WU Eric | V D D V D | V V V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 8 | PIVOVAROV Lucas | V V D D D | V V V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 9 | COLLINS Kaden | V V V V V D | V D | 0.7 | 5 | +4.3 |
| 10 | PRAKASH Hari | D V V V V | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 11 | CHENG Trevor | V V V V D | V D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
| 12 | YUEN Nathan | V D D V V V | V D | 5.1 | 4 | -1.1 |
| 13 | KLINKNER Richard | V D V D V V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 14 | XU Yanwen | D V V V D V | V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 15 | WONG Ethan | V V D D V V | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 16 | CHEW Aedan | D V D D V D | V V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 17 | GUO Woody | V V V V V V | D | 2.8 | 6 | +3.2 |
| 18 | SIM Ian | V V V V V | D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 19 | HINTON Evan | D V V V V | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 20 | MCNAMARA Scott | V V V D D V | D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
| 21 | CHAUDHURI Kabir | V V D V V D | D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 22 | CLAES Thomas | D V V V D | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 23 | JOHAR Manvik | V D D V V | D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 24 | LOMIO Nicholas A. | V D D V V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 25 | RUFANOV Maxim | D D V V D V | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 26 | BHARGAV Angad | D D V V D V | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 27 | KOERBER Christopher T. | V D D V D | V D | 4.0 | 2 | -2.0 |
| 28 | CHANG Kristopher | V D V D D | V D | 0.6 | 2 | +1.4 |
| 29 | LOGUE Paul | D D D D V | V D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 29 | ZHAO Qinglin | V D D D D | V D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
| 31 | COHEN Joshua | D D D D D D | D | 2.5 | 0 | -2.5 |
| 32 | MARTIN Zachary | D D D D D | V D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 33 | LI Sean | D D V V V | D | 1.1 | 3 | +1.9 |
| 34 | CAMPBELL Kenneth | D V D D V V | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 | |
| 35 | DUONG John | V D D D V | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 36 | LOUIE Joseph | D D D V V | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 37 | CHENG Zijun | V V D D D D | D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 38 | CHAUDHARY Rohan | V D D D V D | D | 0.8 | 2 | +1.2 |
| 39 | BAUMAN Colin | D D D V D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 40 | BHATT Arjun | D V D D D | D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
| 41 | KUO Michael | D D V D D D | D | 3.4 | 1 | -2.4 |
| 42 | MITCHEM Paolo | D D D V D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 43 | TALATAM Arnav | D D D V D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 44 | PEARSON Steven A. | D D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
| 45 | PLOSCARU Matthew | D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.