New Jersey City University - John Moore Athletic Center - Jersey City, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | GUGALA Hanna | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 38% | 53% |
2 | LI Sonia | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 21% | |
3 | LEOU Korina | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 43% | 44% |
3 | KWON Ava | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 39% | 18% | |
5 | CHOI Charlotte | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% | |
5 | SHMULER Fiona | - | 2% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 12% | |
7 | IANNUZZI Lucy | 1% | 7% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 5% | |
8 | NEMORIN Rei | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% | |
9 | LOO Kaitlyn | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 19% |
10 | FUNG Iris | - | - | 1% | 6% | 28% | 47% | 18% |
11 | ZHANG Ashley | - | 4% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 8% | |
12 | LI Tiffany | - | 4% | 22% | 40% | 28% | 6% | - |
13 | MACKAY Katherine | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% | |
14 | NIU Jessica | - | 3% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 9% | |
15 | PARK Haylie | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% | |
16 | LAFFY Lily | 14% | 34% | 33% | 15% | 4% | - | |
17 | BAIK Sarah | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 17% | |
18 | BORGUETA Madison | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 5% |
19 | MERMEGAS Olivia | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 43% | 28% | |
20 | YANNOPOULOS Pompie | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 15% |
21 | GONG Joy | - | - | 1% | 7% | 30% | 47% | 15% |
22 | OSMINKINA-JONES Kai | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 35% | 9% | |
23 | DAMBAL Sasha | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 35% |
24 | VISWANATHAN Nishka | 1% | 11% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
25 | WANG JiaQi | - | - | 3% | 15% | 42% | 40% | |
26 | VATS Ishita | 5% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 6% | - | |
27 | REN Katherine | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 12% | |
28 | HUANG Pierra | 9% | 35% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | |
29 | YOUNG Sienna | 1% | 10% | 34% | 37% | 15% | 2% | - |
30 | CHEN Victoria | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 23% | 5% |
31 | LEE Grace | 5% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | |
32 | WONG Charlene | - | 3% | 18% | 38% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
33 | XU Elaine | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 18% | 2% |
34 | LIANG Claire | 1% | 12% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 2% | |
35 | BERRIOS Catalina | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 36% | 12% | |
36 | CHOWDHERY Myra | 2% | 14% | 37% | 34% | 12% | 2% | |
37 | NG Sophia | 17% | 43% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | |
38 | GALLAGHER Isabella | 5% | 23% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
39 | REDA Sophie | 1% | 11% | 31% | 37% | 17% | 3% | |
40 | GENTILE Vittoria | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 4% |
41 | LEE Janice | 1% | 7% | 27% | 40% | 21% | 4% | - |
42 | WANG Keira | 12% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
43 | JOHN Sophia | 7% | 27% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% | |
43 | ZHAO Selena | 6% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 5% | - | |
45 | NANDA Maanika | 1% | 7% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% | |
46 | STADNIK Emilia | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% | |
47 | CONVERSO-PARSONS Maia | 25% | 44% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
48 | HAGN Luna | 4% | 22% | 41% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
49 | SHI Chuqing | 13% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
50 | PITRUN Viktorie | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
51 | MULLER Inara | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
52 | LEIGH Adalene | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% | |
53 | BHARDWAJ Riya | 42% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
54 | WANG Chloe | 29% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | |
55 | MCCARTHY Nora Louisa Abrous | 17% | 47% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | |
56 | GONZALEZ Alexis | 44% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
57 | KWON Ava | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
58 | BUCCINO Sloane | 34% | 46% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
59 | JONES Nima | 3% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
60 | LIAO Amber | 40% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | |
61 | DEMRY Kylee | 47% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - | |
62 | KAKAR Sahana | 57% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
63 | ELLIS Saffa | 23% | 45% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
64 | MADDISON Erica | 28% | 48% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.