The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Take Action

Division 1/Parafencing National Championships + April NAC

Junior Women's Foil

Friday, April 26, 2024 at 2:00 PM

Salt Palace Convention Center - Salt Lake City, UT, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 LUNG Katerina V V V V V V V V V V V V 5.6 6 +0.4
2 JING Emily V V V V V V V V V V V D 5.5 6 +0.5
3 GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. V V V V V V V V V D 4.0 5 +1.0
3 CHEN Jia P. V V D V D V V V V V D 5.4 4 -1.4
5 LIU Jaelyn A. V V V V V V V V V D 5.5 6 +0.5
6 TAN Kaitlyn N. V V V V V V V V D 3.9 5 +1.1
7 HAYES Nadia D V V V D V V V V D 4.7 4 -0.7
8 KIM Rachel D V D D V V V V V D 2.5 2 -0.5
9 CHUSID Mikayla V V V D V V V V D 5.4 5 -0.4
10 YANG Iris V V D V V V V V D 4.2 5 +0.8
11 KIM Katherine D V V V V V V V D 5.1 5 -0.1
12 CHEN Renee V V V V V D V V D 4.0 5 +1.0
13 KOENIG Charlotte R. V V V D V V V V D 5.5 5 -0.5
14 PEVZNER Victoria V V D V V V V D 4.2 4 -0.2
15 CHO Rebecca H. V V V V D V V D 3.6 4 +0.4
16 GRIFFIN Emma G. V D V V V V V D 4.3 4 -0.3
17 LIU Joy Zhaoyi V V V V V V V D 4.7 6 +1.3
18 FEDELI Caterina S. V V V V V V D 4.3 5 +0.7
19 OUYANG Bridgette Z. V V D V V V V D 4.6 5 +0.4
20 HO Brianna W. V D V V V V V D 4.5 5 +0.5
21 LIN Zhi Tong V V V V V D V D 3.8 5 +1.2
22 SHEN Emilia D V V V V V V D 3.9 5 +1.1
23 LEE Lavender V V V D V V D 3.9 4 +0.1
24 GOOR Viviene E. V D V D V V V D 4.0 4 -
25 SONG Yuqiao Aprille D V V V V D V D 4.5 4 -0.5
26 FENG Grace V D D V V V V V D 2.7 4 +1.3
27 YANG Emma D D V V V V V V D 3.0 4 +1.0
28 SHENG Chuxi V D V D V V V V D 3.1 4 +0.9
29 DAVIS Bonnie Z. D V V V D D V V D 4.2 3 -1.2
30 SHA Yi Ling V D D V D V V V D 1.9 3 +1.1
31 YANG Audrey D V V V D D V V D 2.9 3 +0.1
32 SEO IRENE Y. V V V D D D V V D 4.0 3 -1.0
33 DENG Melissa V V V V V D 2.5 5 +2.5
34 JANG Kimberley V V V V V D 4.0 5 +1.0
35 KONG Chin-Yi V V D V V V D 5.1 5 -0.1
35 FUNG Vera V V D V V V D 3.5 5 +1.5
37 CHEN Allison V. V D V V V V D 4.5 5 +0.5
38 OH Ceana V V V V D D 2.0 4 +2.0
39 WANDJI Anais V V D V V D 3.3 4 +0.7
40 COOPER Piper W. V V D V V D 2.2 4 +1.8
41 CHEN Chloe I. D D V V V V D 4.3 4 -0.3
42 CHOW Annabelle V V D V D V D 2.8 4 +1.2
43 CALISE Ella V D V V D V D 4.0 4 -
44 LI Eleanor V V V D V D D 2.9 4 +1.1
45 EYER Hailey M. V D V V V D D 5.1 4 -1.1
46 MI Aileen V D V D V V V D 3.6 4 +0.4
47 FUNG Emma V V V D V D V D 3.4 4 +0.6
48 SUN Ruoxi V V V D D V D 3.9 3 -0.9
49 ZHAO Sophie L. V D V V D V D 3.0 3 -
50 CHO Emily (Euran) D V V V D V D 2.8 3 +0.2
51 LOCKE Savannah D D V V D V V D 4.2 3 -1.2
52 ROZPEDOWSKI Claire V V D D V D V D 2.4 3 +0.6
53 RANDOLPH Piper D V V D V D V D 3.6 3 -0.6
54 SHIM Grace J. D D V V V D V D 3.0 3 -
55 LEE Jiahn (Lana) D D V D V V D 3.5 2 -1.5
56 NISSINOFF Alexandra D V D V D V D 3.0 2 -1.0
57 ZHANG Alina C. D D D V V V D 3.6 2 -1.6
58 CASTANEDA Erika L. V D D D V V D 4.0 2 -2.0
59 WANG SIQI D V D V D V D 1.8 2 +0.2
60 STRUGAR Steliana V V D D D V D 2.2 2 -0.2
61 PEVZNER Nicole D D V V D V D 2.5 2 -0.5
62 HSU Kaylin D V V D D V D 2.1 2 -0.1
63 SHMAY Anastasia V D V D D D V D 2.2 2 -0.2
64 XIE Su D D V D D V V D 1.0 2 +1.0
65 LIU Samantha V V V D D D 0.5 3 +2.5
66 ZHOU Catherine V D V D V D D 2.6 3 +0.4
67 SWANSON Alexa D V D D V V D 2.2 3 +0.8
68 SUN Chloe D V D V D V D 3.6 3 -0.6
69 YU Jane V V V D D D D 1.9 3 +1.1
70 TAYLOR Gabby V V D D V D D 1.0 3 +2.0
71 KO Claire D V V D D D 1.6 2 +0.4
72 LUO Sandra J. V D D D V D 2.4 2 -0.4
73 FENG Audrey D D V V D D 0.9 2 +1.1
74 LIU Eva D D D V V D 0.5 2 +1.5
75 ORVANANOS Anice D V D D V D 2.6 2 -0.6
76 CASTANEDA Keira V D D V D D 1.7 2 +0.3
77 LAI Sophia D D V D V D 1.9 2 +0.1
78 MANIKTALA Prisha D D V D V D 1.8 2 +0.2
78 LEE Allison D D V V D D 1.0 2 +1.0
80 MEI Sarah D D V V D D D 3.4 2 -1.4
81 CANNON Lira J. D D V D D V D 2.9 2 -0.9
81 MARKOVSKY Nina D V D D D V D 2.2 2 -0.2
83 CHANG Elizabeth D D D V V D D 1.9 2 +0.1
84 MU Allison V D D V D D D 2.4 2 -0.4
85 ZHANG Selena V D D D D V D 2.4 2 -0.4
86 BEAVER Hannah V D V D D D D 2.4 2 -0.4
87 PAULUS Isabella D V V D D D D 1.8 2 +0.2
88 GREEN Marisa D D D D V V D 1.3 2 +0.7
89 QUINN Anna D V D D V D D 1.3 2 +0.7
90 DAI Zizhuo (Zizi) D D D D V D 2.1 1 -1.1
91 ASCHETTINO Aurora D D D D V D 2.8 1 -1.8
92 SAIFEE Lamya V D D D D 1.6 1 -0.6
93 VO Bao-Vy V D D D D 1.4 1 -0.4
94 SUN Emily D V D D D D 2.8 1 -1.8
95 RAO Sonia D. V D D D D D 2.0 1 -1.0
96 PANT Anisha V D D D D D 2.6 1 -1.6
97 KIM Sydney D V D D D D 0.8 1 +0.2
98 ZHANG Eunice D D D V D D 2.5 1 -1.5
99 CHOI Kailyn D D D D D V 1.6 1 -0.6
100 SEAL Cameron I. D D D D V D 1.4 1 -0.4
101 ROY Layla D D D D D 1.3 0 -1.3
102 WHELAN Amelia D D D D D 1.2 0 -1.2
103 WANG Xiaolan D D D D D 1.0 0 -1.0
104 GUO Audrey D D D D D D 0.8 0 -0.8
105 WANG CAROL D D D D D 1.8 0 -1.8
106 URDANETA LARGURA Sylvia D D D D D D 0.6 0 -0.6
106 KIM Claire D D D D D D 0.8 0 -0.8
106 KRAATZ Kira D D D D D D 0.0 0 -
109 FERGUSON Aliya D D D D D D 0.5 0 -0.5
109 ZAMELIS Madelyn D D D D D D 0.8 0 -0.8
109 FELICIANO Claudia D D D D D D 1.1 0 -1.1
112 ZHANG Vicky D D D D D D 0.0 0 -

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.