South Hackensack, NJ - South Hackensack, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZU Kevin | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 39% | 19% | |
| 2 | SO Hananiah | - | - | 3% | 19% | 45% | 33% | |
| 3 | GILES Jeremy M. | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 25% | |
| 3 | LINSKY Matthew | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 31% |
| 5 | MOSZCZYNSKI Adam | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% |
| 6 | WUN William | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 3% |
| 7 | MORRIS Samuel A. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 18% |
| 8 | KOVACS Christian | 5% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | |
| 9 | MORREALE John | - | 4% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 8% | |
| 10 | TRAVAGLIONE Conor D. | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 34% | 58% |
| 11 | BARTOLO Domenic V. | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 34% | 9% | |
| 12 | CZYZEWSKI Konrad R. | - | - | 8% | 33% | 42% | 15% | |
| 13 | LEVIN Mark A. | - | 5% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 8% | |
| 14 | PARK Collin D. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 43% | 19% |
| 15 | TANG Albert | - | 4% | 15% | 30% | 31% | 16% | 3% |
| 16 | CZAHA Balint | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 10% | |
| 17 | TANG Brendan J. | - | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 32% | 11% |
| 18 | LIU Vincent S. | 1% | 7% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 5% | |
| 19 | CHAN Daniel | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 38% | 17% | 3% |
| 20 | YEN Preston | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 11% |
| 21 | ROMAN Alec J. | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 21% | |
| 22 | YAO Jonathan | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 11% |
| 22 | REYES Kyle | 6% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 24 | SZEWCZYK Thomas D. | 1% | 7% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 25 | WYCHE Scott H. | - | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 26 | WOLIN Zachary A. | - | 1% | 4% | 17% | 34% | 33% | 12% |
| 27 | GHOSH Tuhin | - | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
| 28 | CHAN Alexander S. | - | 2% | 22% | 42% | 28% | 6% | |
| 29 | RYAN Joshua P. | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 4% |
| 30 | LIU Kelly | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 17% | 2% |
| 31 | ALTIRS Alexander | 1% | 7% | 21% | 32% | 26% | 11% | 2% |
| 32 | BOHRA Rohan | 4% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 6% | 1% | |
| 33 | GILLIGAN Wolff | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 35% | 15% |
| 34 | HENNICKE Michael G. | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 6% |
| 35 | WU Nicholas R. | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 8% | |
| 36 | CHO Brandon | - | 1% | 10% | 40% | 39% | 11% | |
| 37 | CHENG Justin | 1% | 8% | 23% | 33% | 24% | 9% | 1% |
| 38 | PATTON Colin T. | 1% | 9% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 5% | 1% |
| 39 | HUANG Tyler T. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 40 | HAMMARBERG Eric | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% |
| 41 | TSODIKOV Matthew G. | - | 2% | 22% | 43% | 27% | 6% | |
| 42 | TAKEMARU Leo | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 20% | |
| 43 | HONG Vincent Q. | 2% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 2% | |
| 44 | STEINMETZ John | 1% | 10% | 37% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 45 | SHAN Ethan | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 46 | LEDERER Justin W. | 5% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 47 | TEVEBAUGH Andrew | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
| 48 | HO Kaden M. | 1% | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 49 | XU Michael | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 50 | SHIMER Joseph (Joey) D. | - | 1% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% |
| 51 | BLIM Charlie M. | 9% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 52 | MARTINEZ Justin | 10% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 53 | SPRANG Nicholas D. | 3% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% | |
| 54 | CLAWSON Amzie | 11% | 32% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 55 | ANGELILLO Nicholas | 17% | 40% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 56 | QIN Alexander | - | 3% | 19% | 40% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
| 57 | DUNN John (Jack) F. | 9% | 27% | 33% | 22% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 58 | COLE Alexander | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 3% |
| 59 | HALL Justyn | 18% | 42% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 60 | OLAODE Stephen | 2% | 19% | 45% | 27% | 6% | - | |
| 61 | WEISS Nathan | 25% | 44% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 62 | ZATZ Ben Z. | 43% | 43% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 63 | DEWEY Charles J. | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 64 | LEE Jude H. | 11% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 65 | SURICO Michael | - | 2% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
| 66 | GRYCIUK Koby | 59% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 68 | SPRINGER Patrick | 66% | 30% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 69 | TIERNO Thomas J. | 26% | 57% | 16% | 1% | - | - | |
| 69 | BUCCINO George | 20% | 40% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 71 | FISK Ethan | 23% | 46% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 72 | RUDNET Noah | 7% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 73 | GEORGE Daniel | 30% | 44% | 21% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 74 | YOU Jaden | 18% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 75 | REDA Myles | 40% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 76 | BAHETI Devesh | 10% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 77 | TOCKMAN Hunter | 10% | 59% | 27% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 78 | FRUNGILLO benjamin | 10% | 54% | 32% | 4% | - | - | |
| 79 | DEFORD Kevin W. | 57% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.