South Hackensack, NJ - South Hackensack, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | ZU Kevin | V V V V D | V V V V V V | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 2 | SO Hananiah | V V V V V | V V V V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 3 | GILES Jeremy M. | V V D D V | V V V V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 3 | LINSKY Matthew | V V V V D V | V V V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 5 | MOSZCZYNSKI Adam | D V V V V V | V V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 6 | WUN William | V V V D V V | V V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 7 | MORRIS Samuel A. | D V V D V V | V V V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
| 8 | KOVACS Christian | V D V D D | V V V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 9 | MORREALE John | V V V V V | V V D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
| 10 | TRAVAGLIONE Conor D. | V V V V V D | V V D | 5.5 | 5 | -0.5 |
| 11 | BARTOLO Domenic V. | V V V D V | V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 12 | CZYZEWSKI Konrad R. | V V D D V | V V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 13 | LEVIN Mark A. | V V D D V | V V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 14 | PARK Collin D. | D D V V V D | V V D | 4.7 | 3 | -1.7 |
| 15 | TANG Albert | V D V V D D | V V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 16 | CZAHA Balint | V D D D V | V V D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
| 17 | TANG Brendan J. | V V V V V V | V D | 4.3 | 6 | +1.7 |
| 18 | LIU Vincent S. | V V V V V | V D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
| 19 | CHAN Daniel | V V V V V V | V D | 3.7 | 6 | +2.3 |
| 20 | YEN Preston | V V V V V V | V D | 4.2 | 6 | +1.8 |
| 21 | ROMAN Alec J. | V V V V D | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 22 | YAO Jonathan | V V D D V V | V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 22 | REYES Kyle | V D D V V V | V D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
| 24 | SZEWCZYK Thomas D. | V D V V D V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 25 | WYCHE Scott H. | V D V V D V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 26 | WOLIN Zachary A. | D V V V V D | V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 27 | GHOSH Tuhin | D V D V V V | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 28 | CHAN Alexander S. | D D V V V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 29 | RYAN Joshua P. | V V D V D D | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 30 | LIU Kelly | D D V V V D | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 31 | ALTIRS Alexander | D V D D V D | V V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 32 | BOHRA Rohan | D V D D D | V V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 33 | GILLIGAN Wolff | V V V V V V | D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
| 34 | HENNICKE Michael G. | V V V D V V | D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 35 | WU Nicholas R. | V D V V V | D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 36 | CHO Brandon | D V V V V | D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 37 | CHENG Justin | D V D V V V | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 38 | PATTON Colin T. | D V V V D V | D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 39 | HUANG Tyler T. | V D V D V V | D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 40 | HAMMARBERG Eric | V V V V D D | D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 41 | TSODIKOV Matthew G. | V D D V V | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 42 | TAKEMARU Leo | D D V V V | D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 43 | HONG Vincent Q. | D V V V D | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 44 | STEINMETZ John | D V D V V D | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 45 | SHAN Ethan | V D D D V V | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 46 | LEDERER Justin W. | D D V V D V | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 47 | TEVEBAUGH Andrew | V V D V D D | D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 48 | HO Kaden M. | D D D V V V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 49 | XU Michael | D V V D V D | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 50 | SHIMER Joseph (Joey) D. | V D V D V D | D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 51 | BLIM Charlie M. | D V D D V V | D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 52 | MARTINEZ Justin | D V V D D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 53 | SPRANG Nicholas D. | V D D D V | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 54 | CLAWSON Amzie | D V D D V | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 55 | ANGELILLO Nicholas | V D D D V D | V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 56 | QIN Alexander | V D D D D V | V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 57 | DUNN John (Jack) F. | V D V D D D | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 58 | COLE Alexander | D D V V D D | V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 59 | HALL Justyn | D D D V D | V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 60 | OLAODE Stephen | D D D V D | V D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 61 | WEISS Nathan | D D D V D | V D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 62 | ZATZ Ben Z. | V D D D D | V D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 63 | DEWEY Charles J. | V D D D D D | V D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 64 | LEE Jude H. | D V D D D D | V D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 65 | SURICO Michael | V V D D D D | D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 66 | GRYCIUK Koby | V D D D D V | D | 0.5 | 2 | +1.5 |
| 68 | SPRINGER Patrick | D V D D D | D | 0.4 | 1 | +0.6 |
| 69 | TIERNO Thomas J. | D D V D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 69 | BUCCINO George | D D D V D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 71 | FISK Ethan | D D D D D V | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 72 | RUDNET Noah | D D V D D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 73 | GEORGE Daniel | D D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
| 74 | YOU Jaden | D D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 75 | REDA Myles | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 76 | BAHETI Devesh | D D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
| 77 | TOCKMAN Hunter | D D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
| 78 | FRUNGILLO benjamin | D D D D D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 | |
| 79 | DEFORD Kevin W. | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.