South Hackensack, NJ - South Hackensack, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | KIM Juni C. | V V V D V V | V V V V V | 5.3 | 5 | -0.3 |
| 2 | WHELAN Thomas (Tony) | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
| 3 | PAK Sean | D V V V V V | V V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 3 | SHENG Patrick Y. | V V V D V V | V V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 5 | KOKENGE Chad | V V V V V | V V D | 2.6 | 5 | +2.4 |
| 6 | BREKHMAN Maxim | V V V V D V | V V D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
| 7 | MACKIN Samuel | D V V V V V | V V D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
| 8 | MCDARBY Michael B. | V V D D D | V V V D | 4.2 | 2 | -2.2 |
| 9 | SMITH Nicholas S. | V D V V V V | V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 10 | DISIMONE David Z. | V V V D V V | V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 11 | BOGUSLAVSKY Daniel | V V D V V | V V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 12 | STILIANOS Stephen T. | V D V V V D | V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 13 | ALFAIATE Lucas | V V V V D D | V V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 16 | MAAS Sean H. | D V D V V V | V V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
| 17 | O'BRIEN Timothy S. | V V V V V V | D | 1.4 | 6 | +4.6 |
| 18 | JACKSON Anthony I. | V V D V V D | V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 19 | SVIBEN Carson | V D V V D V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 20 | AYALA Jaime | D V V V D V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 21 | SALERNO Jacob | D V V V V D | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 22 | LI Brian | D D V V V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 23 | LEHR William D. | V D V D D V | V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
| 24 | MCNELIS Brendan J. | V D V V D D | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 25 | PAK Charles | V D D V V D | V D | 4.5 | 3 | -1.5 |
| 26 | HUANG Forest | V D D V D V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 27 | SHREM Samuel G. | D V V D D V | V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
| 28 | VAYSBUKH Konstantin | D D V V D V | V D | 4.4 | 3 | -1.4 |
| 29 | SVIBEN Cameron | V V D D V D | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 30 | PEDERSEN Christopher C. | V D D D V D | V D | 4.4 | 2 | -2.4 |
| 31 | HA ETHAN | V D V D D D | V D | 4.1 | 2 | -2.1 |
| 33 | KIRSCH Adam J. | V D V V V D | D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 35 | STEVENS George | D D V V D V | D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 36 | MAGDA Daniel | D V V V D D | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 37 | LEWIS William J. | V V D D V D | D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
| 38 | LIU Frank | D D D V V V | D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 39 | LI Jeffrey | V D D D D V | D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
| 40 | CHEUNG Liyan | D D D D V V | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 41 | TUCKER Owen J. | D V V D D D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 42 | WANG Eric S | D D D V V D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 43 | SINGCUENCO Lance | D V V D D D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 44 | LIU Jack | D V D D D V | D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
| 45 | WHITEHURST JJ | V D D D V D | D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
| 46 | ZHANG William | D D V D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 47 | FITZGIBBON Sean P. | D D D D D V | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 48 | LAI Coby | D V D D D D | D | 3.4 | 1 | -2.4 |
| 49 | STANLEY Dominick | V D D D D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 50 | RAJ Prakrit | D D D D D V | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 51 | ZHUANG Alex | D D D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
| 52 | PRADHAN Aryan | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 53 | DA GRACA Julio | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 54 | CHIN Nicholas | D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
| 55 | NESTERCZUK Maddox W. | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.