South Hackensack, NJ - South Hackensack, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LEE Olive | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 26% | |
| 2 | KIM Elizabeth Y. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 40% | 26% |
| 3 | LIN Julia L. | - | 5% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 11% | |
| 3 | ALVIDREZ Francesca A. | - | - | 5% | 24% | 44% | 26% | |
| 5 | KOWALSKY Rachel A. | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 38% |
| 6 | SZEWC Alexandra | - | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 38% | 11% |
| 7 | EBRAHIM Ameera H. | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 15% | |
| 8 | OAKE Erica | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 5% |
| 9 | LURYE Lina | - | - | 3% | 18% | 45% | 34% | |
| 10 | MAO Amy | - | 4% | 20% | 40% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 11 | MING Cynthia | 6% | 25% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | |
| 12 | GLASSNER Sophia Rose S. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% | |
| 13 | WICKEN Baylee S. | - | 4% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 8% | |
| 14 | CHANG Ella | 2% | 11% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 15 | KOKES Ava | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% |
| 16 | MOK Chloe R. | 6% | 33% | 40% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 17 | TOMASELLO Olivia E. | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 19% | |
| 18 | GOLDBERG Sophie C. | 3% | 19% | 40% | 30% | 8% | 1% | |
| 18 | ADVINCULA Anabella E. | 1% | 7% | 27% | 40% | 22% | 3% | |
| 20 | SHI Angela L. | 2% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 21 | SLACKMAN Valerie | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 42% | 17% | |
| 22 | CANNEY Lauren | 4% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
| 23 | INAMDAR Nina S. | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% | |
| 24 | ZENG Katrina | 6% | 25% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
| 25 | HARJANI Meher | 30% | 41% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 26 | BOWIE Charlotta | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% | |
| 27 | PARDO Sarah | 1% | 8% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 4% | |
| 29 | RAI Ananya | 16% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 30 | MCGEE Sophia | 1% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% | |
| 31 | WITTE Vera | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 24% | 6% | |
| 32 | CARBO laura | 20% | 40% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 33 | BULOVA Sophie | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 12% | 2% |
| 34 | BOOK Ayelet | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 4% | |
| 35 | BRANDWEIN Elizabeth | 20% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 36 | NICOU Nicole | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | |
| 37 | LI Alisha | 2% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 2% | |
| 38 | JOSEPH mikayla | 13% | 32% | 33% | 17% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 39 | BIMSON Charlotte | 32% | 44% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
| 40 | PEREZ Bianca | 43% | 40% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 41 | CORDERO Allison | 11% | 32% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 43 | ABDUL AMBER | 11% | 37% | 37% | 13% | 1% | - | |
| 44 | PANDEY Aashna | 25% | 44% | 25% | 6% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.