Salt Palace Convention Center - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | CHO Inga | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 52% |
2 | BHATT Morgane | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 30% |
3 | SEAL Julie T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 50% |
3 | GRANHOLM Carolyn N. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 41% | 9% | |
5 | WALTERS Anne-Marie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 53% | |
6 | FINTER Rose | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 78% | 25% |
7 | BOGDAN Doina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 32% | 6% |
8 | FEDDE Rachel A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 52% | 14% | |
9 | MADDOX Lacey E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 66% | 16% |
10 | MERRITT Elizabeth (Badger) E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 40% |
11 | HENNIG-TRESTMAN Bonnie L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 21% |
12 | CHAPMAN Lesley F. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 55% | 16% | |
13 | KERR Margaret E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 29% | 6% |
14 | HERMES Kathleen A. | 100% | 100% | 92% | 64% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
15 | DRESSEL Pamela (Pam) A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 74% | 21% | 2% |
16 | PIERRYNOWSKI Kathryn S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 50% | 10% | |
17 | STEVENS Joanne B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 65% | 19% | 2% |
18 | ORLOVA Elena | 100% | 100% | 94% | 64% | 18% | 2% | - |
19 | BASSIK Judith M. | 100% | 100% | 91% | 59% | 18% | 2% | |
20 | TRELOAR Allison F. | 100% | 100% | 83% | 42% | 10% | 1% | |
21 | BROWN Rachel (Rachel Brown) F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 38% | 6% |
22 | GUNTRUM Pamella (Pam) L. | 100% | 99% | 83% | 38% | 7% | - | - |
23 | DE LA FOSCADE-CONDON Celine | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 35% | 7% | |
24 | FERGUSON Diane F. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 69% | 23% | 3% | - |
25 | WU Velyn | 100% | 98% | 62% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
26 | HUEY Sharone A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 18% | 3% |
27 | MORRISON Monica L. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 26% | 3% | - |
27 | GLUCK Myriam | 100% | 68% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - |
29 | ECKSTEIN Harriet A. | 100% | 72% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
30 | HERAWATI Lili | 100% | 7% | - | - | - | - | |
31 | SOBISKY Kari | 100% | 87% | 46% | 9% | - | - | - |
32 | GARDNER desaree | 100% | 47% | 7% | - | - | - | |
33 | BALCE Cyril | 100% | 74% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - |
34 | MOORE Annette | 100% | 98% | 81% | 31% | 4% | - | - |
35 | LAU-ALLEN Macy | 100% | 77% | 30% | 4% | - | - | - |
36 | ANGULOT Sharon | 100% | 76% | 26% | 4% | - | - | - |
37 | ROSENFELD Madelon M. | 100% | 99% | 70% | 26% | 4% | - | |
38 | MORO Diana | 100% | 10% | - | - | - | - | - |
39 | PRESTWICH Paula J. | 100% | 53% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
39 | COFFEY Barbara | 100% | 60% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.