Mission Fencing Center - Rocky Point, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | BROWN Lola | - | - | - | - | 4% | 28% | 68% |
| 2 | YACOBUCCI Nadia | - | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 38% | 19% |
| 3 | CAI Ilana | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 36% | |
| 3 | ORRINGER Lottie | - | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 45% | 20% |
| 5 | FIELD Elizabeth | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 36% | 53% |
| 6 | BING Charlotte | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 45% | 34% |
| 7 | WANG Amabel | - | - | - | - | 5% | 31% | 64% |
| 8 | GONG Hai | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 33% | 59% |
| 9 | LIN Yunong | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
| 10 | LI Savannah | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 38% | 12% | |
| 11 | MCFARLANE Asha | - | - | 4% | 19% | 41% | 32% | 3% |
| 12 | TSIMIKLIS Aphrodite | - | - | 1% | 4% | 17% | 40% | 38% |
| 13 | SHIN Elizabeth | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
| 14 | YIN Chloe | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 40% | 22% | 3% |
| 15 | MCSHERRY Kayla | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 8% |
| 16 | SHIN SE EUN | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 21% |
| 17 | ORBÉ-AUSTIN Maya | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 17% | 2% |
| 18 | KRAHE Annika | - | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 44% | 22% |
| 19 | CAO Amelie | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 20 | EYER Brooke | - | - | 4% | 18% | 41% | 32% | 5% |
| 20 | DAI Iris Yuyang | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 3% |
| 22 | DOUGLAS Addison | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 23 | CHOI Cara | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 24 | DE CASTRO Kai | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 3% |
| 25 | BYK Karalina | 1% | 8% | 23% | 33% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 26 | MURPHY Genevieve | 2% | 12% | 27% | 32% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 27 | EPSTEIN Naomi | 4% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 28 | NWODO Naila | 3% | 16% | 31% | 30% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 29 | BO Iris | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% | |
| 30 | ZHU Alivia | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 31 | CASCONE Sophie | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 28% | 5% |
| 32 | ZHILKOV Anya | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 33 | SHTEPA Sofia | 9% | 39% | 37% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 34 | KOU Elisha | 1% | 8% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
| 35 | ZHENG Annalyn | 9% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 36 | ENRIQUEZ Bianca Perla | 7% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 37 | FENG Claire | 1% | 10% | 33% | 39% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 38 | JAZWINSKI Ivy | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 39 | CHUNG Stella | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 40 | KENNEDY Izadora | 5% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
| 41 | FEDER Acadia | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 42 | ELLISON Ingrid | 8% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
| 43 | BENNETT Emi | 9% | 29% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 44 | KIRBY Emelie | 13% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 45 | HOROWITZ Shuli | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 31% | 4% |
| 46 | ZHANG Selina | 8% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
| 47 | WU Charlotte | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 48 | XING Melly | 14% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 49 | DINAR Julia | 13% | 34% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 50 | CHAN Kaitlyn | 14% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 51 | REILLY Carys | 3% | 21% | 41% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 52 | JOO Sara | 1% | 5% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 53 | LI Doreen | 16% | 39% | 33% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 54 | LI Christina | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 55 | HAFEZ Sahar | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 56 | LUO lucy | 17% | 37% | 31% | 12% | 3% | - | - |
| 57 | CHAN Jolene | 4% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 58 | ZHANG Priscilla | 2% | 11% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 59 | HEMPHILL Mia | 18% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 60 | DONG Katelyn | 51% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 61 | LIANG Jasmine | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 62 | STUART Skylar | 3% | 23% | 43% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.