Boston Fencing Club - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KAO Castor T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 80% |
| 2 | YANG Adam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 53% | |
| 3 | CANNON Caiden C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 58% | |
| 3 | SULLIVAN Jackson R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 61% | |
| 5 | HE Xiangrui | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 66% | 13% | |
| 6 | CHENG Ethan | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 10% | 1% | |
| 7 | GUPTA Varun | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 39% | 4% |
| 8 | NUNNINK Phillip W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 30% | |
| 9 | KATAYAMA Kevin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 68% | |
| 10 | DOBBINS Evan W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 37% | |
| 11 | LI Arvin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 28% | |
| 12 | SIMA Congyu Josh | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 25% | |
| 13 | XU Andy P. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 11% | |
| 14 | KITAGAWA Eric S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 52% | 10% | |
| 15 | WANG Rory | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 26% | 3% | |
| 16 | MIALL Steven A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 43% | |
| 17 | LIU Derek | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 47% | 9% | |
| 18 | LI Aaron | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 18% | 1% |
| 19 | TAN Aidan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 12% | |
| 19 | WANG Winston | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 59% | 15% | |
| 21 | DOCTOR Aidan L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 61% | 18% | |
| 22 | SHAO Eric | 100% | 98% | 83% | 39% | 5% | - | |
| 23 | LEE Jonah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 24% | |
| 24 | COSTELLO Chaissen F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 28% | |
| 25 | ZOBEL Eric H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 83% | 26% | |
| 26 | BING Charles | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 59% | |
| 27 | YAO Bradley | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 38% | 8% | |
| 28 | JIANG Owen | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 15% | |
| 29 | FENG Michael | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 2% | |
| 30 | LIGH Thomas | 100% | 91% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 31 | KONG Luculentus X. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 30% | 4% | - | |
| 32 | WANG Brian | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 11% | 1% | |
| 33 | SEIB-LEVINSON Conrad | 100% | 78% | 34% | 6% | < 1% | - | |
| 34 | DAVIDSON Elliot | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 8% | |
| 35 | DJONOUMA Toyohm | 100% | 71% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 36 | MILLER Aidan A. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 33% | 7% | |
| 37 | MCLAUGHLIN Ryan | 100% | 88% | 51% | 14% | 1% | - | |
| 38 | ZHEN Ethan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 75% | 24% | 2% | |
| 39 | ZHONG Maxwell | 100% | 92% | 61% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 40 | TIBBETTS Justin | 100% | 67% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 41 | LUM-DEBONO Alex | 100% | 100% | 94% | 64% | 21% | 2% | |
| 42 | MILLER Andrew | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 9% | |
| 43 | LI Allen | 100% | 82% | 40% | 8% | - | - | |
| 44 | ROZALSKI Eli | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 8% | - | |
| 45 | ARCE Andrew W. | 100% | 98% | 78% | 34% | 6% | - | |
| 46 | ZHAO Brandon | 100% | 85% | 39% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 47 | LI Ayren | 100% | 98% | 71% | 31% | 7% | 1% | |
| 48 | LAO Kevin | 100% | 73% | 27% | 4% | - | - | |
| 48 | SONG Noel | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 26% | 3% | |
| 50 | VO Jonathan | 100% | 53% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 51 | LYNCH Owen C. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 46% | 10% | 1% | |
| 52 | YANG Dylan | 100% | 80% | 38% | 8% | - | - | |
| 53 | WOHLERS Trevor | 100% | 77% | 32% | 5% | - | - | |
| 54 | SURESH Rohan | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 55 | LARGAESPADA LUIS V. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 11% | |
| 56 | XU Ethan | 100% | 99% | 86% | 44% | 7% | - | |
| 57 | BAKSHI Aman | 100% | 76% | 30% | 4% | - | - | |
| 58 | CENCE Myles K. | 100% | 79% | 30% | 4% | - | - | |
| 59 | FINLEY Dylan | 100% | 98% | 83% | 45% | 8% | - | |
| 60 | TJON Calum | 100% | 90% | 56% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 61 | SHAMBARGER Graham | 100% | 47% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 62 | CHREKY Jacob D. | 100% | 86% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 63 | GE Daniel | 100% | 93% | 62% | 21% | 3% | - | |
| 64 | BRAVO ORTEGA Estéfano | 100% | 93% | 66% | 28% | 6% | - | - |
| 65 | ZHAO Brian | 100% | 84% | 30% | 4% | - | - | |
| 66 | SENANI Arjun | 100% | 71% | 28% | 5% | - | - | |
| 67 | STAFFORD Gareth | 100% | 60% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 68 | FORTES PINA Adrian | 100% | 41% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 69 | MILLER Dillon | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 70 | TANG Terry | 100% | 92% | 61% | 24% | 4% | - | |
| 71 | MASTRONARDI Joseph M. | 100% | 86% | 45% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 71 | WAYBRIGHT Matteo | 100% | 63% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 73 | BERETICH Brian | 100% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.