Boston Fencing Club - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | ZHEXUAN yu | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 52% | |
2 | HOPPA Luke H. | - | - | 6% | 32% | 50% | 11% | |
3 | TORDO Garrett | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 47% | |
3 | BERA Enzo | - | - | 1% | 12% | 41% | 46% | |
5 | GONG Jerry | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 30% | |
6 | CHEN Samuel | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 8% |
7 | MEI Yujie | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 21% |
8 | HENDERSON Lucas | 2% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
9 | CLARK Gabriel | - | - | 4% | 20% | 42% | 30% | 4% |
10 | RODRIGUEZ Darlin | - | - | - | - | 4% | 28% | 68% |
11 | BADUSHOV Anton | - | 1% | 5% | 24% | 42% | 26% | 3% |
12 | GRIECI Noah | - | 7% | 34% | 41% | 16% | 2% | |
13 | TOZZI Massimo | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 8% | |
14 | ZHOU William | - | 2% | 19% | 42% | 31% | 6% | |
15 | CUSUMANO Neal | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
16 | TAUER Sam | 3% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 1% | |
17 | CHENG Brandon | - | 2% | 22% | 43% | 28% | 5% | |
18 | LAUB William | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 8% | |
19 | SAKAYEDA Jacob | 8% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | |
20 | WEN Edward | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 8% | |
21 | SHIMER Joseph (Joey) D. | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 18% | |
22 | ROSADO Sebastian | 31% | 42% | 21% | 5% | - | - | |
23 | MAGNI Jesse | - | 5% | 22% | 40% | 26% | 6% | - |
24 | CARR Dylan | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 8% |
25 | BARROWS Hunter | 5% | 46% | 37% | 11% | 1% | - | |
26 | PEREIRA Beckham | - | 3% | 26% | 43% | 24% | 4% | |
27 | JOHNSON Colin | 18% | 38% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | |
28 | ZONG Yujie | 5% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
29 | AO Christopher | 2% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | |
30 | DESAUTELS Connor | 2% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 2% | |
31 | COOKSON Leonardo | 1% | 11% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 3% | |
32 | KMETA-SUAREZ Graysen | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | |
33 | SHINCHUK Daniel | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 3% | |
34 | LIBBY Benjamin | 15% | 39% | 33% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
35 | ONG Dylan | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
36 | JAIN Karanvir | 19% | 59% | 20% | 2% | - | - | |
37 | SAUVE Quinn | 86% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - | |
38 | ZISLIN Benjamin | 12% | 37% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
39 | BLACKBURN Henry | 39% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
40 | LIEUWMA Nicolas | 7% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
41 | HAUSLER Jayden | 20% | 42% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
42 | KHOTLINE Daniel | 59% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
43 | SIMMONS John M. | < 1% | 9% | 38% | 40% | 12% | 1% | |
44 | BRUMBAUGH Alex | 69% | 29% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.