Savage Fencing Club - Savage, MD, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | ||
1 | SNIDER Jeffrey H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 10% |
2 | DEUCHER Joseph H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 57% | 20% | |
3 | PATTERSON Malcolm (Werewolf) D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 21% | 3% |
3 | CHRISTY Peter C. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 41% | 13% | 2% | |
5 | SWICK Kerry J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 57% | 23% | 4% | |
6 | COLETTA David | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 26% | 6% | 1% | |
7 | ROTONDI Gregory V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 13% |
8 | ROUSE Joseph (Joe) T. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 64% | 32% | 9% | 1% | |
9 | O'DOWD Andrew J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 31% | 6% | |
10 | LU Qi | 100% | 88% | 57% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | |
11 | O'REILLY Robert | 100% | 87% | 48% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
12 | YAKIMENKO Andrei | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 56% | 19% | |
13 | SIN Steve | 100% | 95% | 76% | 43% | 16% | 3% | - | |
14 | MOORE Guy L. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
15 | EVANS Allen L. | 100% | 100% | 92% | 64% | 25% | 5% | - | |
16 | SCHENCK Brian D. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 24% | 6% | 1% | |
17 | ARMSTRONG Gary | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
18 | MARKOWITZ William M. | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 23% | 5% | 1% | |
19 | ORLANDO Janine | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - |
20 | SCHROEDER William | 100% | 98% | 84% | 55% | 24% | 6% | 1% | |
21 | TAN Theodore | 100% | 95% | 66% | 25% | 4% | - | - | - |
22 | PAWTAN Carly | 100% | 80% | 41% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.