Rockland Community College - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CAI Ilana | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 34% | 57% |
| 2 | SHIN SE EUN | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% |
| 3 | MCFARLANE Asha | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 43% | 24% |
| 3 | KRAHE Annika | - | - | 3% | 14% | 38% | 38% | 6% |
| 5 | GONG Hai | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 40% | 47% |
| 6 | LI Savannah | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 43% | 30% |
| 7 | ROBERTS Anastasia | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 21% | |
| 8 | ORRINGER Lottie | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 51% |
| 9 | SHIN Elizabeth | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 40% | 16% |
| 10 | BAULIN Zoya | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% | |
| 10 | ORBÉ-AUSTIN Maya | - | - | 3% | 18% | 44% | 35% | |
| 12 | JIANG Chloe | - | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 44% | 13% |
| 13 | ZHU Ella | 16% | 37% | 32% | 12% | 2% | < 1% | - |
| 14 | DE CASTRO Kai | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 41% | 16% | |
| 15 | FEDAN Nicole | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 44% | 39% |
| 16 | DINAR Julia | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% | |
| 17 | MURPHY Genevieve | - | - | 4% | 18% | 39% | 32% | 7% |
| 18 | JOO Sara | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 19 | COUAILLIER Lou | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% | - |
| 20 | MACKINTOSH Quinn | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 1% |
| 21 | JAZWINSKI Ivy | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 2% |
| 22 | ZHANG Zoey | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 4% |
| 23 | XING Melly | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
| 24 | TAO Isabella | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 37% | 24% | 5% |
| 25 | CHAN Jolene | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 8% | |
| 26 | CHOI Cara | 6% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% | |
| 27 | CHUNG Stella | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 28 | FEDER Acadia | - | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 29 | LEO Jenna | 1% | 15% | 39% | 33% | 10% | 1% | |
| 30 | SINGH Evangelina | 1% | 5% | 19% | 34% | 31% | 11% | |
| 31 | CAO Amelie | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 16% | 3% |
| 32 | RAFFAELE Nancy | 1% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 33 | PARK Hannah | - | 4% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 34 | BALIN Sophia | 3% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | |
| 35 | WU Charlotte | 7% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 36 | LU Miaotian | 15% | 36% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 37 | ENRIQUEZ Bianca Perla | - | 7% | 29% | 41% | 20% | 3% | |
| 38 | ZHENG Annalyn | 3% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
| 39 | HAFEZ Sahar | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 8% | |
| 40 | DONG Katelyn | 54% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 41 | CHAN Kaitlyn | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 42 | CESAIRE Giselle | 17% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 43 | ALLEN Sophia | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 43 | HUSSAIN Maya | 6% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 45 | PAEK Ellie | 38% | 41% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 46 | SHARAIEVSKA Mariia | 8% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
| 47 | BENTLEY Amelia | 37% | 42% | 18% | 4% | - | - | |
| 48 | ZHU Alivia | 2% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 49 | HOLLIS Priscillia | 7% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 50 | YOUM Amelia | 21% | 41% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 51 | SHUTZER Lily | 3% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 52 | LAU Victoria | 30% | 43% | 22% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 53 | SPEZAKIS Hypatia | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 54 | ZHANG Caroline | 13% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 55 | PAEK Mila | 14% | 39% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 56 | KHETPAL Aalia | 11% | 41% | 35% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 57 | ELLISON Ingrid | 3% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 58 | XU Charlene | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 59 | LI Doreen | 13% | 33% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | |
| 60 | HUANG Gabrielle | 9% | 34% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.