Purchase, NY - Purchase, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | INSLER Gabriel C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 17% |
| 2 | BRUNET Nathan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 66% | 32% | 7% |
| 3 | CHIN Ethan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 55% | 22% | 4% |
| 3 | KANG Michael H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 9% |
| 5 | KAMBESELES Jack M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 13% |
| 6 | KRONROD Tal | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 14% | |
| 7 | SUICO Zachary Emanuel O. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 9% | |
| 8 | PAOLINI Nathan R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 16% |
| 9 | BEKKER Mitchel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 18% |
| 10 | SLAVINSKIY Alan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 44% |
| 11 | KUMAR Anitya | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 36% | 7% | |
| 12 | GARCIA-ROGERS Kyle J. | 100% | 96% | 78% | 46% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 13 | BAKER Kevin G. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
| 14 | KIM Juni C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 33% | |
| 15 | CHON Thierry | 100% | 99% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 16 | PHILLIPS Ethan D. | 100% | 74% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 17 | MALENFANT Vincent | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 23% | 4% |
| 18 | POLKOVSKY Dylan S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 37% | |
| 19 | LAVENSTEIN Kinley V. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 5% |
| 20 | ELAMURUGAN Kavin | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 16% | 2% | |
| 21 | ZARETSKY Daniel A. | 100% | 94% | 66% | 29% | 6% | 1% | |
| 22 | SVIBEN Cameron | 100% | 96% | 69% | 30% | 7% | 1% | |
| 23 | SHENG Patrick Y. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 31% | 6% |
| 24 | PAK Sean | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 11% |
| 25 | DOLMETSCH Max | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 26 | DIXON Samuel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 21% | 3% |
| 27 | WOLOSZYN Austin | 100% | 96% | 72% | 34% | 8% | 1% | |
| 28 | LIU Jack | 100% | 94% | 72% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 29 | ZHAO Luhan | 100% | 66% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 30 | DISIMONE David Z. | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 48% | 18% | 3% |
| 31 | DEMARCO Luke | 100% | 80% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 32 | TUCKER Owen J. | 100% | 79% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 33 | MCDERMOTT Brian | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 14% | |
| 34 | FENWICK Luke A. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 12% | 1% | |
| 35 | WOLOSZYN Aidan G. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 26% | 4% |
| 36 | PAK Charles | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
| 37 | BORATIN Daniel I. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 57% | 24% | 4% |
| 38 | LEHR William D. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 19% | 3% |
| 39 | LI Brian | 100% | 87% | 53% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 40 | SHINE Peter C. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 20% | 3% | |
| 41 | SPANO Gideon S. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 16% | 2% | |
| 42 | MACKIN Samuel | 100% | 95% | 69% | 30% | 6% | - | |
| 43 | SOOMRO Adam A. | 100% | 96% | 75% | 38% | 10% | 1% | |
| 44 | JENNINGS Adin | 100% | 71% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 45 | HURDAL Leif G. | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 45 | WANG Eric S | 100% | 89% | 58% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 48 | DELP Alexander J. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 48 | SIDDIQUI HUMZA K. | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 50 | SVIBEN Carson | 100% | 95% | 71% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 51 | GREINER Jack | 100% | 73% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 52 | ARIETTA Rudy | 100% | 98% | 73% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 53 | COX Gavin V. | 100% | 70% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.