Liontree Arena (RIMAC) @ UC San Diego - La Jolla, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | PECK Maia A. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 44% | |
| 2 | LAI Amanda | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 24% | |
| 3 | BUSH Emma | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 45% |
| 3 | PHUKAN Indra | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 40% | 26% |
| 5 | KUKVA Taisiya | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 12% | |
| 6 | CHANG Celine A. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 35% | 37% | 11% |
| 7 | LIN Ashley | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 27% | |
| 8 | BHATT Anisha | 3% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 2% | |
| 9 | MUN Brianna K. | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 15% | |
| 10 | ZHU Riley | 7% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 11 | KANE Chloe | 5% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 6% | - | |
| 12 | MANDAP Svetlanna | - | 4% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 9% | |
| 13 | MOHEBI Neeka | 3% | 19% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
| 14 | NELSON-LOVE Lily B. | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 43% | 28% | |
| 15 | MOLLINIER Angel | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
| 16 | AIRES Julia | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
| 17 | LEE Olivia | - | - | - | 5% | 23% | 45% | 27% |
| 18 | CHIRASHNYA Mika | 2% | 13% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% | |
| 19 | WANG Jessie | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 44% | 22% |
| 20 | MENDOZA Zoie | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
| 21 | XU Jessica | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 22 | SHARMA Sanvi | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 17% | |
| 23 | LIANG Jingjing | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% | |
| 24 | MAI Mailan | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
| 25 | CAMAMA Tessa | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 37% | 10% | |
| 26 | LEE Camilla | 1% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 5% | |
| 27 | CHUNG Penelope | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
| 28 | BLANCO Ariia | 7% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | |
| 28 | XU Serena | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% | |
| 30 | HANKINS Morgan | - | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 31 | FISCHBEIN Quinley | 4% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 32 | HERNANDEZ-CHENG Isabel | 5% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 33 | YIN Gabriela | 8% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - | |
| 34 | DUONG Zoey | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% | |
| 35 | JAMES Ashley | 2% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 36 | BAUTISTA DE ROBLES Ekaterine | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 2% |
| 37 | LI Yunxuan (Joy) | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 38 | SIMHADRI Sanjana | 34% | 41% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 39 | LEE Yeriel | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 2% | |
| 40 | WU Jessica | 3% | 19% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
| 41 | HSIU Elizabeth | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 10% | |
| 42 | HERD Angela | 13% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | |
| 43 | SUN Karolyn | 40% | 42% | 15% | 3% | - | - | |
| 44 | LIN Isabel | 24% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 45 | HASIM Eurietta | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
| 46 | XIONG Xiaotu | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 1% | |
| 47 | YUMIACO Nylah | 21% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 48 | GAGARING Genia | 13% | 33% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - | |
| 49 | BURICEA Ada | 2% | 15% | 35% | 34% | 13% | 1% | |
| 50 | SCANLAN Alina Nev | 48% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 51 | CHANG Abigail | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 52 | LINARES Chantal | 1% | 8% | 29% | 40% | 20% | 2% | - |
| 53 | DANKO Siena | 8% | 28% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 54 | ZHANG Helen | 25% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 55 | RADOV Una | 14% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 56 | CHEONG Chloe | 8% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 57 | ZHAO Yanning | 32% | 43% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.