Liontree Arena (RIMAC) @ UC San Diego - La Jolla, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | PECK Maia A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 44% | |
| 2 | LAI Amanda | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 24% | |
| 3 | BUSH Emma | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 45% |
| 3 | PHUKAN Indra | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 26% |
| 5 | KUKVA Taisiya | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 12% | |
| 6 | CHANG Celine A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 11% |
| 7 | LIN Ashley | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 27% | |
| 8 | BHATT Anisha | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 2% | |
| 9 | MUN Brianna K. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 15% | |
| 10 | ZHU Riley | 100% | 93% | 64% | 25% | 5% | - | |
| 11 | KANE Chloe | 100% | 95% | 70% | 31% | 7% | - | |
| 12 | MANDAP Svetlanna | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 39% | 9% | |
| 13 | MOHEBI Neeka | 100% | 97% | 77% | 40% | 11% | 1% | |
| 14 | NELSON-LOVE Lily B. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 28% | |
| 15 | MOLLINIER Angel | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 17% | 2% |
| 16 | AIRES Julia | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
| 17 | LEE Olivia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 27% |
| 18 | CHIRASHNYA Mika | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 19% | 3% | |
| 19 | WANG Jessie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 22% |
| 20 | MENDOZA Zoie | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 16% | 2% |
| 21 | XU Jessica | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 22 | SHARMA Sanvi | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 17% | |
| 23 | LIANG Jingjing | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 17% | |
| 24 | MAI Mailan | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 6% | 1% | |
| 25 | CAMAMA Tessa | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 10% | |
| 26 | LEE Camilla | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 28% | 5% | |
| 27 | CHUNG Penelope | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 9% | 1% | |
| 28 | BLANCO Ariia | 100% | 93% | 67% | 32% | 8% | 1% | |
| 28 | XU Serena | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 9% | |
| 30 | HANKINS Morgan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 31 | FISCHBEIN Quinley | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 32 | HERNANDEZ-CHENG Isabel | 100% | 95% | 70% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 33 | YIN Gabriela | 100% | 92% | 63% | 26% | 5% | - | |
| 34 | DUONG Zoey | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 31% | 7% | |
| 35 | JAMES Ashley | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 36 | BAUTISTA DE ROBLES Ekaterine | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 17% | 2% |
| 37 | LI Yunxuan (Joy) | 100% | 94% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 38 | SIMHADRI Sanjana | 100% | 66% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 39 | LEE Yeriel | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 18% | 2% | |
| 40 | WU Jessica | 100% | 97% | 77% | 40% | 11% | 1% | |
| 41 | HSIU Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 10% | |
| 42 | HERD Angela | 100% | 87% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 43 | SUN Karolyn | 100% | 60% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 44 | LIN Isabel | 100% | 76% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 45 | HASIM Eurietta | 100% | 93% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% | |
| 46 | XIONG Xiaotu | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 13% | 1% | |
| 47 | YUMIACO Nylah | 100% | 79% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 48 | GAGARING Genia | 100% | 87% | 55% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 49 | BURICEA Ada | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 14% | 1% | |
| 50 | SCANLAN Alina Nev | 100% | 52% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 51 | CHANG Abigail | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 52 | LINARES Chantal | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 23% | 2% | - |
| 53 | DANKO Siena | 100% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 54 | ZHANG Helen | 100% | 75% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 55 | RADOV Una | 100% | 86% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 56 | CHEONG Chloe | 100% | 92% | 61% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 57 | ZHAO Yanning | 100% | 68% | 26% | 5% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.