Purchase, NY - Purchase, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | FANG Sabrina | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 31% | 63% |
2 | KOENIG Charlotte R. | - | 2% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 4% |
3 | LUNG Katerina | - | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 38% | 20% |
3 | LIN Ashley | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
5 | HE Xiangxin | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 41% | 17% | |
6 | ZHENG Ivy | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 37% | 55% |
7 | CHEN Jia P. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 23% |
8 | COSTELLO Angeline S. | 1% | 10% | 34% | 38% | 16% | 2% | |
9 | SARTORI Taylor M. | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% |
10 | LEE Bethany W. | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
11 | XIE zoey | 5% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
12 | SHEN Lydia | - | 5% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
13 | SHAW Kayla M. | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 6% |
14 | CHEN Jessie S. | - | - | 1% | 11% | 35% | 42% | 11% |
15 | WU Irene M. | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
16 | BOODELL Ella | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 7% |
17 | HOLLE Aviella S. | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 40% | 16% | 2% |
18 | SONG ShuXuan (Liliya) | 5% | 20% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
19 | SADAN Jordan E. | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 6% |
20 | MILLER Naomi E. | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
21 | ZHAO Aileen Y. | 1% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% | - |
22 | LI Rachel Y. | - | 3% | 20% | 40% | 29% | 7% | - |
23 | CHEN Allison V. | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 3% |
24 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 2% |
25 | ZHANG Alina C. | - | - | 4% | 22% | 45% | 29% | |
26 | LOGAN Jade | 12% | 44% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - | |
27 | HUANG NATALIE | - | 7% | 30% | 40% | 20% | 3% | |
28 | DU Hannah | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
29 | FU Qihan | 3% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 2% | - |
30 | ADAMS KIM Natalie | 1% | 8% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
31 | XU Madison | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
32 | HUNT Abigail S. | 18% | 38% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
33 | MCKEE Alexandra K. | 1% | 14% | 40% | 33% | 11% | 1% | - |
34 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
35 | BHOGAL Sukhneet | 64% | 31% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
36 | BECCHINA Claire E. | 33% | 42% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
37 | TOBIN Brean | 11% | 49% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
38 | YU Jaime L. | 7% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
39 | WERBACH Esther | 23% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
40 | ZHEN Ellen | 59% | 35% | 6% | - | - | - | |
41 | MEYER Claudia | 49% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.