Purchase, NY - Purchase, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | FANG Sabrina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 63% |
| 2 | KOENIG Charlotte R. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 24% | 4% |
| 3 | LUNG Katerina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 20% |
| 3 | LIN Ashley | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 39% | 12% | 1% |
| 5 | HE Xiangxin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 17% | |
| 6 | ZHENG Ivy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 55% |
| 7 | CHEN Jia P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 63% | 23% |
| 8 | COSTELLO Angeline S. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 56% | 18% | 2% | |
| 9 | SARTORI Taylor M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 61% | 26% | 5% |
| 10 | LEE Bethany W. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 56% | 22% | 4% |
| 11 | XIE zoey | 100% | 95% | 70% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 12 | SHEN Lydia | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 15% | 2% |
| 13 | SHAW Kayla M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 6% |
| 14 | CHEN Jessie S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 11% |
| 15 | WU Irene M. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
| 16 | BOODELL Ella | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 33% | 7% |
| 17 | HOLLE Aviella S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 57% | 17% | 2% |
| 18 | SONG ShuXuan (Liliya) | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 19 | SADAN Jordan E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 64% | 30% | 6% |
| 20 | MILLER Naomi E. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
| 21 | ZHAO Aileen Y. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 22 | LI Rachel Y. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 37% | 8% | - |
| 23 | CHEN Allison V. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 23% | 3% |
| 24 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 16% | 2% |
| 25 | ZHANG Alina C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 29% | |
| 26 | LOGAN Jade | 100% | 88% | 44% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 27 | HUANG NATALIE | 100% | 100% | 93% | 63% | 23% | 3% | |
| 28 | DU Hannah | 100% | 97% | 79% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 29 | FU Qihan | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 30 | ADAMS KIM Natalie | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 31 | XU Madison | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 32 | HUNT Abigail S. | 100% | 82% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 33 | MCKEE Alexandra K. | 100% | 99% | 85% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 34 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | 100% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 35 | BHOGAL Sukhneet | 100% | 36% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 36 | BECCHINA Claire E. | 100% | 67% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 37 | TOBIN Brean | 100% | 89% | 40% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 38 | YU Jaime L. | 100% | 93% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 39 | WERBACH Esther | 100% | 77% | 37% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 40 | ZHEN Ellen | 100% | 41% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 41 | MEYER Claudia | 100% | 51% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.