Rockland RJCC

Cadet Men's Saber

Saturday, April 13, 2019 at 2:45 PM

Purchase, NY - Purchase, NY, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5
1 LILOV Neil 100% 100% 100% 97% 83% 43%
2 KIM Minwook 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 68%
3 GEFELL Andrew P. 100% 100% 100% 97% 81% 37%
3 YAO Jonathan 100% 100% 99% 89% 55% 14%
5 LIM Ryan Y. 100% 100% 100% 96% 74% 29%
6 CHO Brandon 100% 100% 99% 91% 63% 21%
7 MAHONEY Colin M. 100% 100% 97% 68% 23% 3%
8 LEMPERT Levy A. 100% 94% 70% 34% 8% 1%
9 LASORSA Matthew 100% 100% 99% 88% 54% 14%
10 TRUDNOS Allen 100% 100% 99% 86% 47% 10%
11 HO Kaden M. 100% 98% 80% 43% 12% 1%
12 RYAN Edward T. 100% 98% 84% 53% 19% 2%
13 KIM-COGAN Ryan 100% 100% 99% 90% 60% 19%
14 MORRILL Justin 100% 100% 99% 87% 50% 12%
15 YANG Richard 100% 100% 98% 77% 34% 6%
16 HUANG Ian 100% 98% 83% 46% 12% 1%
17 HARRIS Alex K. 100% 100% 100% 98% 85% 42%
18 METTKE Nathaniel 100% 99% 93% 67% 27% 4%
19 YOU Jaden 100% 90% 53% 17% 2% -
20 HUANG Tyler T. 100% 79% 39% 11% 1% -
21 KEEFE Duncan 100% 99% 92% 65% 26% 4%
22 ATEFI Daniel 100% 100% 93% 66% 26% 3%
23 MENSAH Kennedy C 100% 97% 82% 48% 15% 2%
24 EDELMAN Seth A. 100% 93% 60% 21% 4% -
24 NOBLE Colin 100% 97% 76% 36% 8% 1%
26 CHENG Kyle 100% 92% 48% 11% 1% -
27 ZHOU Miles 100% 98% 75% 30% 5% -
28 GOLD Jackson 100% 99% 91% 61% 21% 2%
29 MOULTON Ian 100% 34% 3% - - -
30 KESSLER Josh 100% 69% 25% 4% - -
31 OVERDECK Andrew 100% 57% 16% 2% - -
32 ZHANG Jeffrey 100% 97% 81% 46% 14% 1%
33 HAN Daniel Y. 100% 80% 36% 8% 1% -
34 PILAT Matthew J. 100% 77% 12% 1% - -
35 GEORGE Daniel 100% 48% 10% 1% - -
36 KULKARNI Rohan 100% 31% 4% - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.