Rockland Community College - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LI Aaron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 38% |
| 2 | SHAPIRO Leon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 40% | |
| 3 | FENG Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 53% | |
| 3 | CHEN Hanson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 38% | |
| 5 | ZENG Rick | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 31% | 5% |
| 6 | KO Caleb | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 25% | 4% |
| 7 | CHENG Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 38% |
| 8 | JIN Andy | 100% | 96% | 77% | 44% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 9 | ARCE Andrew W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 68% | 18% | |
| 10 | LI Allen | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 27% | 4% | |
| 11 | SURESH Rohan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 25% | |
| 12 | ABRAMKIN Tim | 100% | 89% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 13 | LIU Derek | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 48% |
| 14 | GRIFFITH MCALLISTER Thomas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 50% | 12% |
| 15 | JURMAN Therin | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 23% | 3% | |
| 16 | BAKSHI Aman | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 17 | MARTIN Darius | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 59% | 16% |
| 18 | BELCHAMBER Mason | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 26% | 4% | |
| 19 | TANG Terry | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 21% | |
| 20 | LEE Eugene | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 31% |
| 21 | HOLMES Alexiy | 100% | 99% | 90% | 67% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 22 | MATTOS Luis Felipe | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 17% | |
| 23 | ZAPPALA Nikolai | 100% | 100% | 95% | 63% | 18% | 1% | |
| 24 | SIMONOV Timofey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 30% | |
| 25 | CHO Xzander | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 13% | |
| 26 | ZHANG GAVIN J | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 7% | 1% |
| 27 | HOLLIS Sean | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 28 | KRZYWON Dylan | 100% | 84% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 29 | LU Jingyi | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 30 | TANG Alexander L. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 11% | |
| 31 | WONG Jacob W. | 100% | 93% | 65% | 26% | 5% | - | |
| 32 | XIE Jicheng | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 33 | HARRA Alexander | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
| 34 | POLEPALLI Vinil | 100% | 90% | 58% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 35 | TOOMRE Kai | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
| 36 | DIAZ Gabriel | 100% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 37 | COSSROW Alex | 100% | 85% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 38 | PERLMAN Taiyo | 100% | 93% | 65% | 27% | 5% | - | |
| 39 | POLEBOYINA Amrit | 100% | 100% | 92% | 50% | 10% | 1% | |
| 40 | MA Leon | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 15% | 2% | |
| 41 | PECK Quinn | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
| 42 | ONIK Ari N. | 100% | 92% | 64% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 43 | CHA James | 100% | 83% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 44 | DA SILVA Jamie | 100% | 79% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 45 | QIAN Zekai | 100% | 85% | 45% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 46 | CHEN kenneth | 100% | 76% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 47 | BARBANEL Joseph | 100% | 91% | 59% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 47 | WANG Ancen | 100% | 85% | 47% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 49 | CHUN Alexander | 100% | 35% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 50 | CAO Justin | 100% | 96% | 76% | 43% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 51 | SHAW Spencer | 100% | 91% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 52 | REN Ryan | 100% | 90% | 60% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 53 | ZHANG Julian | 100% | 69% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 54 | GREENE Amit | 100% | 91% | 60% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 55 | MO Ethan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 56 | ROSE Jack | 100% | 80% | 23% | 3% | - | - | |
| 57 | CHUN Zachary | 100% | 70% | 27% | 5% | - | - | |
| 58 | COUAILLIER Leo | 100% | 68% | 26% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.