Rockland Community College - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SHEFFIELD Skye | - | - | 3% | 19% | 44% | 33% | |
| 2 | ADYANTHAYA Anika | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 17% |
| 3 | MEYER Rebecca | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 43% | 21% | |
| 3 | GANSER Nicole | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 40% | 42% |
| 5 | WU Michelle | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 43% | 31% |
| 6 | WANG Cecilia | - | 3% | 17% | 43% | 37% | ||
| 7 | BOROTKO Katerina | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 41% | 15% | |
| 8 | SHAYAKHMETOVA Suzanna | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 41% | 18% | |
| 9 | LOBANOVA Varvara | - | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% |
| 10 | MENKIN Kate | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 11 | GOH Cayla | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 26% |
| 12 | ZHANG Jane | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% | |
| 13 | BI Michelle | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 37% | 16% | 2% |
| 14 | YU Livia | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 15 | BISONO Valentina | - | 2% | 15% | 37% | 35% | 11% | |
| 16 | LI Caroline | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 23% | |
| 17 | FENG Iris | - | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 40% | 15% |
| 18 | NING Miranda | 6% | 28% | 41% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 19 | ZHONG Evelyn | 2% | 13% | 36% | 38% | 12% | ||
| 20 | DESANTIS-IBANEZ Elena | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 12% |
| 21 | VENKATESAN Harshitha | - | 5% | 24% | 41% | 25% | 5% | |
| 22 | WONG Angelina | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 23 | WANG Selina | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 16% | 2% |
| 24 | GOLIYAD Lisa | 5% | 25% | 41% | 24% | 5% | ||
| 25 | HU Chloe | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 25 | SHEIKH PAREE | 1% | 12% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 27 | CHAKRAPANI Tara | 7% | 35% | 37% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 28 | JU Jennifer | 27% | 44% | 23% | 5% | - | - | |
| 29 | XIAO Katelyn | 19% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 30 | WU Madisen | - | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 31 | YU Sara | 15% | 40% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 32 | YAO Sophia | 15% | 35% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 33 | CHERNOBRIVETS Maria | 4% | 25% | 41% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 34 | ZHANG Claire | - | 4% | 23% | 41% | 26% | 5% | |
| 35 | ORDORICA Abra | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | - |
| 36 | JOHN Hannah | 10% | 31% | 34% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 37 | HOWARD Katherine | 48% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 38 | CHOU Andrea | 5% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
| 39 | SOGUKTAS Vildan | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 18% | 4% |
| 40 | INAMDAR Devaki | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 41 | XU Mulan | 21% | 44% | 28% | 7% | 1% | ||
| 42 | HARBES Emma | 18% | 40% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 43 | JIANG chenxi | 13% | 41% | 34% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 44 | LEE Ahjeong | 27% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 45 | SHABBIR Aiza | 7% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 46 | GARZON Lucia | - | 9% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 47 | KAMENSKY Elina | 2% | 19% | 41% | 29% | 8% | 1% | |
| 48 | ABRAGAN Isabel Grace | 38% | 44% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 49 | YOUN Emily | 19% | 43% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 50 | KHANNA Bhairavi | 55% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 51 | ARORA Siya | 22% | 43% | 27% | 7% | 1% | ||
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.