Rockland Community College - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SHEFFIELD Skye | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 33% | |
| 2 | ADYANTHAYA Anika | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 17% |
| 3 | MEYER Rebecca | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 21% | |
| 3 | GANSER Nicole | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 42% |
| 5 | WU Michelle | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 73% | 31% |
| 6 | WANG Cecilia | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 37% | ||
| 7 | BOROTKO Katerina | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 15% | |
| 8 | SHAYAKHMETOVA Suzanna | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 18% | |
| 9 | LOBANOVA Varvara | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 10% |
| 10 | MENKIN Kate | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 39% | 12% | 1% |
| 11 | GOH Cayla | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 26% |
| 12 | ZHANG Jane | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% | |
| 13 | BI Michelle | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 19% | 2% |
| 14 | YU Livia | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 15 | BISONO Valentina | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 45% | 11% | |
| 16 | LI Caroline | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 23% | |
| 17 | FENG Iris | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 56% | 15% |
| 18 | NING Miranda | 100% | 94% | 65% | 24% | 4% | - | |
| 19 | ZHONG Evelyn | 100% | 98% | 86% | 49% | 12% | ||
| 20 | DESANTIS-IBANEZ Elena | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 12% |
| 21 | VENKATESAN Harshitha | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 30% | 5% | |
| 22 | WONG Angelina | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
| 23 | WANG Selina | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 19% | 2% |
| 24 | GOLIYAD Lisa | 100% | 95% | 70% | 29% | 5% | ||
| 25 | HU Chloe | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 25 | SHEIKH PAREE | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 27 | CHAKRAPANI Tara | 100% | 93% | 58% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 28 | JU Jennifer | 100% | 73% | 29% | 5% | - | - | |
| 29 | XIAO Katelyn | 100% | 81% | 41% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 30 | WU Madisen | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 31 | YU Sara | 100% | 85% | 44% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 32 | YAO Sophia | 100% | 85% | 50% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 33 | CHERNOBRIVETS Maria | 100% | 96% | 71% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 34 | ZHANG Claire | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 31% | 5% | |
| 35 | ORDORICA Abra | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 36 | JOHN Hannah | 100% | 90% | 59% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 37 | HOWARD Katherine | 100% | 52% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 38 | CHOU Andrea | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 10% | 1% | |
| 39 | SOGUKTAS Vildan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 22% | 4% |
| 40 | INAMDAR Devaki | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 41 | XU Mulan | 100% | 79% | 35% | 7% | 1% | ||
| 42 | HARBES Emma | 100% | 82% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 43 | JIANG chenxi | 100% | 87% | 46% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 44 | LEE Ahjeong | 100% | 73% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 45 | SHABBIR Aiza | 100% | 93% | 67% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 46 | GARZON Lucia | 100% | 100% | 90% | 57% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 47 | KAMENSKY Elina | 100% | 98% | 78% | 37% | 8% | 1% | |
| 48 | ABRAGAN Isabel Grace | 100% | 62% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 49 | YOUN Emily | 100% | 81% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 50 | KHANNA Bhairavi | 100% | 45% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 51 | ARORA Siya | 100% | 78% | 35% | 7% | 1% | ||
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.