Rockland Community College - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GENTILE Vittoria | - | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 13% |
| 2 | CROOKS Riley | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 19% |
| 3 | BAIK Sarah | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 33% | 31% | 11% |
| 3 | MACKAY Katherine | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 12% | |
| 5 | GONG Joy | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 23% |
| 6 | MYAT Chloe | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 41% | 22% | |
| 7 | SHMULER Fiona | - | - | 1% | 7% | 30% | 45% | 17% |
| 8 | FOSS Persephone | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 21% | |
| 9 | FUNG Iris | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 46% | 31% |
| 10 | YANNOPOULOS Pompie | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 24% |
| 11 | CASTELO Soleil | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 24% | 6% |
| 12 | OSMINKINA-JONES Kai | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
| 13 | BERRIOS Catalina | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 20% | |
| 14 | AKULA Roszlynn | 2% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 15 | NG Sophia | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 16 | MULLER Inara | 1% | 8% | 24% | 33% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 17 | GONZALEZ Veronika | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 44% | 39% |
| 18 | IANNUZZI Lucy | - | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 12% |
| 19 | SHEN Emily | - | - | 5% | 22% | 42% | 26% | 5% |
| 20 | WANG JiaQi | - | - | - | 4% | 22% | 46% | 28% |
| 21 | ZHANG Ashley | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 26% | |
| 22 | BORGUETA Madison | - | - | 5% | 22% | 43% | 30% | |
| 23 | REN Katherine | - | 2% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 4% |
| 24 | CHOI Charlotte | - | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 39% | 20% |
| 25 | LEE Kaitlin | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
| 26 | NANDA Maanika | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 7% | |
| 27 | LIANG Claire | - | 3% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 8% | |
| 28 | GUHA Surabhi | 1% | 13% | 34% | 35% | 15% | 2% | |
| 29 | ZONG Eliane | 3% | 15% | 32% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 30 | RIFKIN Lielle | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 31 | LEE Grace | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 6% | |
| 32 | HUANG Pierra | 2% | 20% | 40% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
| 33 | HARRISON Allie | 2% | 18% | 41% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 34 | WONG Charlene | 2% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 5% | - |
| 35 | ENG Madeleine | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 36 | DESAUTELS Alexandra | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 37 | MAK Jayden | 3% | 19% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
| 38 | SHI Chuqing | 4% | 26% | 40% | 24% | 6% | 1% | |
| 39 | BHARDWAJ Riya | 17% | 38% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 40 | PARK Haylie | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% | |
| 41 | FIGELMAN Maya | 10% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | |
| 42 | LEIGH Adalene | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 43 | ZHAO Selena | 13% | 33% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 44 | REDA Sophie | 4% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
| 45 | KIM Audrey | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% | |
| 46 | HAGN Luna | 29% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 47 | WANG MONA | 2% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 48 | JOHN Sophia | 1% | 8% | 30% | 40% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 49 | CONVERSO-PARSONS Maia | 25% | 43% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 50 | LIAO Amber | 17% | 40% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 51 | BARNES Sarah | 1% | 10% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 52 | WANG Keira | 6% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
| 53 | PITRUN Viktorie | 4% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
| 54 | YOUNG Sienna | 11% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 55 | WANG Selina | 28% | 41% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 56 | MCCARTHY Nora Louisa Abrous | 19% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 57 | HARVEY-LEE Luisa | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 58 | BUCCINO Sloane | 30% | 46% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 59 | NARAYANAN Sinduja | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 60 | JONES Nima | 6% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 61 | DIBADJ Ava | 68% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 62 | DEMRY Kylee | 55% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 63 | LEUNG Ella | 26% | 41% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 64 | LEE Janice | 3% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 3% | - |
| 65 | WEI Madison | 3% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 66 | SMITH Genevieve | 26% | 47% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.