Rockland Community College - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LIU Kevin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 22% |
2 | UEMOTO Ken | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 26% | 4% | |
3 | LIN Philip T. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 13% | |
3 | SUGIURA Samuel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 30% | |
5 | MCCARTHY Devan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 20% |
6 | GONG zihao | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 23% | 4% |
7 | LAUB William | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 10% | |
8 | SASSI Ilyas | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 19% | 3% |
9 | WANG Weiyun | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
10 | HOPPA Luke H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 23% |
10 | CLARK Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 56% | 23% | 4% |
12 | SUBA Lucas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 67% | 32% | 7% |
13 | MEI Yujie | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 9% |
14 | CHUNG Connor | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 29% | |
15 | LEE Andrew | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 19% | 3% |
16 | LIU Isaak | 100% | 98% | 78% | 40% | 10% | 1% | |
17 | ZHAO Lucas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 65% | 25% |
18 | PEREIRA Beckham | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
19 | SADHU Neiyam | 100% | 96% | 68% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
20 | PRIEUR Christian F. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
21 | ZHEXUAN yu | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 24% | |
22 | MARGULIS Jared | 100% | 93% | 68% | 33% | 10% | 2% | - |
23 | AO Christopher | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
24 | JONES Elijah | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 22% | 5% | - |
25 | SEN Christian | 100% | 96% | 70% | 30% | 7% | 1% | |
26 | BERA Enzo | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 19% | |
27 | MEHAN Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 31% |
28 | CLARK Aram | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 31% | 6% |
29 | FELDMAN Drew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 29% | 6% |
30 | ALAVE Kyle | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 27% | 5% |
31 | NG Timothy | 100% | 97% | 75% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
32 | HUANG Maxwell H. | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 12% | 1% | |
33 | ATWOOD Griffin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 34% | 8% |
34 | KIM Theodore | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 67% | 32% | 7% |
35 | RYAN Kai | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 23% | 3% | |
36 | NGUYEN Anthony | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 16% |
37 | POWER Alex | 100% | 99% | 87% | 57% | 23% | 5% | - |
38 | MANESCU Miron | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
39 | ROSADO Sebastian | 100% | 70% | 27% | 5% | - | - | |
40 | CUSUMANO Neal | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
41 | KOGAN Nikita | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 23% | 5% | - |
42 | FREDRICK Jameer | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 27% | 5% |
43 | KMETA-SUAREZ Graysen | 100% | 90% | 60% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
44 | SAGE Sebastian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 35% | 8% |
45 | WANG Michael | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 40% | 13% | 2% |
46 | BODKIN Jake M. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
47 | MCDONALD Finn | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 13% | 2% |
48 | WONG Caleb W. | 100% | 84% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | |
49 | NOTOPRADONO Nicholas | 100% | 98% | 83% | 46% | 13% | 1% | |
50 | SUN Andrew | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 21% | 4% |
51 | TSAO Oliver | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 51% | 19% | 3% |
52 | BAHK Caleb | 100% | 95% | 73% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - |
53 | DESAUTELS Connor | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
54 | PORTER Dupree | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
55 | BAI Evan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 59% | 25% | 5% |
56 | ONG Dylan | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 15% | 3% | - |
56 | CHAKRAVORTY Sohan | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
58 | LIM Brandon | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 23% | 3% | |
59 | WASCO Andrew | 100% | 77% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
60 | LIGH Checed | 100% | 96% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
61 | AHLMAN Jason | 100% | 76% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
62 | ROBERTS Justin C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 10% |
63 | WAGNER Calvin | 100% | 87% | 55% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
64 | SCHIMEL Luke | 100% | 87% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - | |
65 | MAMKIN Nathan | 100% | 51% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
66 | HOWARD Demani | 100% | 75% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
67 | BERGER Jacob | 100% | 93% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
68 | TSAO Alister | 100% | 64% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
69 | JIANG Terence | 100% | 44% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
70 | QUAIL Jonathan | 100% | 87% | 51% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
70 | JAIN Karanvir | 100% | 46% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
70 | WANG tiger | 100% | 82% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
73 | ORTHMANN Tristin | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 43% | 13% | 1% |
74 | GINGERY Julian | 100% | 41% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.