Liontree Arena (RIMAC) @ UC San Diego - La Jolla, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KIM Katherine | - | - | - | - | 1% | 21% | 78% |
| 2 | RANDOLPH Piper | - | - | 3% | 28% | 47% | 21% | |
| 3 | CHEN Chloe I. | - | - | 1% | 11% | 40% | 47% | |
| 3 | LUO Ziyue | - | - | 2% | 20% | 47% | 31% | |
| 5 | LEE Jiahn (Lana) | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 51% |
| 6 | LIU Joy Zhaoyi | - | - | - | 2% | 29% | 69% | |
| 7 | MORALES LEDEZMA Georgina Elizabeth | - | - | 7% | 38% | 42% | 13% | |
| 8 | OH Ceana | - | 2% | 19% | 45% | 33% | ||
| 9 | SUN Chloe | - | - | 3% | 24% | 57% | 16% | |
| 10 | GOOR Viviene E. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 35% | 57% | |
| 11 | SWANSON Alexa | - | - | 2% | 19% | 50% | 27% | 2% |
| 12 | SUN Emily | - | 2% | 12% | 35% | 39% | 11% | |
| 13 | LENK Sophie | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 5% |
| 14 | CHANG Elizabeth | - | 5% | 23% | 41% | 26% | 4% | |
| 15 | HO Addison | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 39% | 14% | |
| 16 | MU Allison | - | 7% | 31% | 44% | 18% | ||
| 17 | CHOI Kailyn | 1% | 16% | 42% | 33% | 8% | ||
| 18 | LIU Samantha | 1% | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | - |
| 19 | MORADI Raiyan N. | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 38% | 13% | |
| 20 | WYNN Kylie | 2% | 16% | 39% | 32% | 10% | 1% | |
| 21 | CUI alivia | - | 3% | 25% | 51% | 19% | 2% | - |
| 22 | LAI Sophia | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 34% | |
| 23 | YANG Audrey | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 42% | 22% | |
| 24 | LI Joy | 9% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 25 | GUAN Adeline | 5% | 27% | 47% | 20% | 2% | - | |
| 26 | REN Kayley | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 3% |
| 27 | YONG Rosalind | 1% | 11% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 28 | ZOU Ella | - | 4% | 18% | 40% | 32% | 6% | |
| 29 | HOBSON Ava | 2% | 16% | 37% | 33% | 11% | 1% | |
| 30 | TAO Ann | 13% | 37% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 31 | HSU Kaylin | - | - | < 1% | 6% | 36% | 51% | 7% |
| 32 | MORALES Paulina | 16% | 39% | 33% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 33 | GUAN Sophie | 2% | 14% | 36% | 35% | 13% | 1% | |
| 34 | LEVESQUE Brielle | 4% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
| 35 | JACOB Norah | 3% | 49% | 39% | 7% | - | - | - |
| 36 | LEE Allison | - | 6% | 30% | 48% | 15% | 1% | |
| 37 | SAIFEE Lamya | - | 2% | 15% | 37% | 35% | 11% | |
| 38 | CHOI Sophie | 27% | 46% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
| 39 | DESAI Esha | 16% | 40% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 40 | WU Chingfei Amber | 24% | 54% | 20% | 2% | - | - | |
| 41 | BOLES Amanda X. | 3% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 10% | 1% | |
| 42 | ZHENG Zoe | 15% | 40% | 33% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 43 | KIM Sydney | 7% | 42% | 38% | 12% | 1% | ||
| 44 | ZHANG Ivy | 3% | 25% | 52% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 45 | ALKADI Mai | 25% | 48% | 24% | 3% | - | - | |
| 46 | ZONG Melody | 33% | 47% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 47 | WILLIAMSON Tessa | 16% | 42% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 48 | FANG Kelervia | 1% | 24% | 50% | 22% | 3% | - | - |
| 49 | GUO Audrey | 24% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 50 | MCDERMOTT Catherine | 73% | 24% | 2% | - | - | ||
| 51 | CAMPOS Camila | 51% | 41% | 7% | - | - | - | |
| 51 | CADENA Anneli | 36% | 46% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 53 | LIU Ariana | 35% | 44% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 54 | KULKARNI myra | 88% | 11% | - | - | - | - | - |
| 55 | JOHNSTON Maeli | 34% | 43% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.