Liontree Arena (RIMAC) @ UC San Diego - La Jolla, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | KIM Katherine | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.8 | 6 | +0.2 |
| 2 | RANDOLPH Piper | V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 3 | CHEN Chloe I. | V D V V V | V V V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 3 | LUO Ziyue | V D V V D | V V V V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
| 5 | LEE Jiahn (Lana) | V V V V D V | V V D | 5.4 | 5 | -0.4 |
| 6 | LIU Joy Zhaoyi | V V V D V | V V D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
| 7 | MORALES LEDEZMA Georgina Elizabeth | V V V D V | V V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 8 | OH Ceana | V V V D | V V V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 9 | SUN Chloe | V V V V V | V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 10 | GOOR Viviene E. | V V V V V | V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 11 | SWANSON Alexa | V V V V D V | V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 12 | SUN Emily | V V V D V | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 13 | LENK Sophie | V D V V V D | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 14 | CHANG Elizabeth | V D V D V | V V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 15 | HO Addison | D V V V D | V V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 16 | MU Allison | D D V V | V V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 17 | CHOI Kailyn | V V V V | D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
| 18 | LIU Samantha | V V D V V V | D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
| 19 | MORADI Raiyan N. | V V D V V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 20 | WYNN Kylie | V V V V D | V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 21 | CUI alivia | D V V V V D | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 22 | LAI Sophia | D V V D V | V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
| 23 | YANG Audrey | V D D V V | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 24 | LI Joy | V V D V D | V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 25 | GUAN Adeline | D D V V V | V D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 26 | REN Kayley | V D V D V D | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 27 | YONG Rosalind | D V D V V D | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 28 | ZOU Ella | D V D V D | V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 29 | HOBSON Ava | V D D V D | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 30 | TAO Ann | V D D V D | V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 31 | HSU Kaylin | D V D D V D | V D | 4.6 | 2 | -2.6 |
| 32 | MORALES Paulina | D V D D D | V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 33 | GUAN Sophie | D V D V V | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 34 | LEVESQUE Brielle | V D V V D | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 35 | JACOB Norah | D D D V V V | D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
| 36 | LEE Allison | V V D D D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 37 | SAIFEE Lamya | D V D D V | D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 38 | CHOI Sophie | V D V D D | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 39 | DESAI Esha | D D V D V | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 40 | WU Chingfei Amber | D V D V D | D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
| 41 | BOLES Amanda X. | D D V D V | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 42 | ZHENG Zoe | D V V D D | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 43 | KIM Sydney | D V D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 44 | ZHANG Ivy | D D D D V | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 45 | ALKADI Mai | D D D V D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 46 | ZONG Melody | D D D D V | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 47 | WILLIAMSON Tessa | D D D D D V | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 48 | FANG Kelervia | V D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 49 | GUO Audrey | D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 50 | MCDERMOTT Catherine | D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
| 51 | CAMPOS Camila | D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 51 | CADENA Anneli | D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 53 | LIU Ariana | D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 54 | KULKARNI myra | D D D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
| 55 | JOHNSTON Maeli | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.