Canlan Sports Lake Barrington - Barrington, IL, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | BARMAKOV Bogdan | - | - | - | - | 3% | 28% | 69% |
2 | SEZER Kaya | - | - | - | - | 8% | 43% | 48% |
3 | CHAN Matthew | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 31% | 7% | |
3 | KEE Andrew L. | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 43% | 32% |
5 | RYAN Connor Q. | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 22% | |
6 | MEJIA Matthew D. | - | - | 3% | 21% | 46% | 30% | |
7 | CAO Leon M. | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 41% | 46% |
8 | OH SEAN | - | - | 1% | 7% | 30% | 46% | 16% |
9 | LIU Ethan | - | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 46% | 20% |
10 | STANLEY Mason B. | - | - | - | - | - | 10% | 89% |
11 | JU Alexander (Alex) Y. | - | - | - | 2% | 18% | 52% | 27% |
12 | FINLEY Dylan | - | 9% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 4% | |
13 | ORONOWICZ Jakub | - | - | 5% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 5% |
14 | LI Samuel | - | - | 6% | 31% | 46% | 15% | 1% |
15 | SINHA Verdhaan | - | 1% | 9% | 33% | 38% | 17% | 3% |
16 | STRINGER David | 1% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 2% | |
17 | VANOYEN Dominick | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 11% | < 1% |
18 | TUAN Evan | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 3% |
19 | GUTH Joseph | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 23% |
20 | KIM Aiden | - | 2% | 15% | 38% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
21 | DORE Davis | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 11% | |
22 | ZHONG Maxwell | 1% | 12% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - |
23 | CHUANG Oscar | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 9% | - |
24 | WOJCIECHOWSKI Matthew N. | - | - | 6% | 28% | 45% | 21% | |
25 | HOLLIDAY Christopher Mansfield-Scott | 1% | 10% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - |
26 | PITERBARG Maxim | - | 1% | 10% | 34% | 39% | 15% | 2% |
26 | BOYKO Miles | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 11% | - |
28 | PINKERTON Joseph H. | - | 3% | 19% | 46% | 27% | 4% | - |
29 | YUE Jackson | 4% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
30 | MCISAAC Finn | 1% | 12% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | |
31 | MAO Connor | - | - | < 1% | 2% | 13% | 44% | 41% |
32 | HOWLAND Jonas | 6% | 26% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
33 | MAO Lucas | - | 4% | 22% | 40% | 28% | 6% | - |
34 | CHO Michael | - | - | 1% | 9% | 33% | 47% | 10% |
35 | KIM Eui Seok | - | 6% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 6% | - |
36 | BIESIADA Jan | 9% | 36% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | |
37 | KAIHATSU Edward J. | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 35% | 9% | |
38 | WILKINS Mateo | - | 7% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 3% | - |
39 | KUE Temujin | 1% | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
40 | ARATA Connor | 1% | 15% | 36% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
41 | KENNEDY christo | 1% | 14% | 46% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
42 | WONG Evan | 5% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
43 | IRVINE Brody | 31% | 42% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | |
44 | ROLDAN-LEVCHENKO Nikita I. | 1% | 13% | 34% | 35% | 15% | 2% | - |
45 | BERSCHEID Arthur | 11% | 38% | 37% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
46 | GOGOI Vir K. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 14% |
47 | LIU Yinhong | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
48 | NAZARIO Dominic | 15% | 41% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
49 | MILLER Douglas S. | - | - | 1% | 13% | 36% | 38% | 11% |
50 | ATKINSON JOSIAH | 6% | 41% | 38% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
51 | REAUME Nate | 37% | 45% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
52 | HAMILTON Brock B. | 1% | 8% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 4% | |
53 | RONE Tosan | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 21% | |
54 | WEINSTEIN Ethan | - | 6% | 27% | 41% | 23% | 4% | - |
55 | BONE Porter | 23% | 56% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - |
56 | FERENCZ Alexander J. | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
57 | HOPKINS Dylan | 57% | 38% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
58 | MAVANI Krishna | 13% | 39% | 36% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
59 | FRASER Rhys | 17% | 44% | 32% | 7% | - | - | - |
60 | LOCKWOOD Jacob | 16% | 43% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | |
61 | GARSKE James | 83% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - | |
62 | REECE Oliver | 27% | 46% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
63 | LAKAS Darius | 73% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
64 | GLOVER George | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
65 | KWANT Henry | 66% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
65 | THAN Duc | 32% | 45% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
67 | LASKONIS Jacob | 76% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.