Indianapolis Fencing Club - Indianapolis, IN, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | ||
1 | THOMAS Samuel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 52% |
2 | PAMERLEAU Ian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 55% |
3 | HAUCK Samuel J. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 62% | 17% |
3 | GUILFORD Corey | 100% | 100% | 99% | 79% | 26% |
5 | STOCK Olivia | 100% | 99% | 73% | 28% | 4% |
6 | RIPLEY Ian | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 32% |
7 | WINGET William (Bill) D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 91% | 33% |
8 | VAN DYK Mark | 100% | 100% | 97% | 51% | 5% |
9 | HENDERSON Emery | 100% | 82% | 13% | 1% | - |
10 | STAUBITZ Marc | 100% | 95% | 49% | 4% | - |
11 | SHI Fangnan | 100% | 96% | 58% | 13% | 1% |
12 | WELLS Aenea | 100% | 65% | 16% | 1% | - |
13 | DUTTON Kimberly | 100% | 22% | 1% | - | - |
14 | DAWES Isabel | 100% | 89% | 14% | - | - |
15 | BESEL Natalie | 100% | 15% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.