Indianapolis Fencing Club - Indianapolis, IN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | ||
| 1 | THOMAS Samuel | - | - | 5% | 43% | 52% |
| 2 | PAMERLEAU Ian | - | - | 4% | 41% | 55% |
| 3 | HAUCK Samuel J. | - | 5% | 32% | 45% | 17% |
| 3 | GUILFORD Corey | - | 1% | 19% | 53% | 26% |
| 5 | STOCK Olivia | 1% | 26% | 45% | 24% | 4% |
| 6 | RIPLEY Ian | - | 3% | 20% | 45% | 32% |
| 7 | WINGET William (Bill) D. | - | - | 9% | 58% | 33% |
| 8 | VAN DYK Mark | - | 3% | 46% | 46% | 5% |
| 9 | HENDERSON Emery | 18% | 69% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 10 | STAUBITZ Marc | 5% | 46% | 45% | 4% | - |
| 11 | SHI Fangnan | 4% | 38% | 45% | 12% | 1% |
| 12 | WELLS Aenea | 35% | 49% | 15% | 1% | - |
| 13 | DUTTON Kimberly | 78% | 20% | 1% | - | - |
| 14 | DAWES Isabel | 11% | 75% | 13% | - | - |
| 15 | BESEL Natalie | 85% | 15% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.