Denison University - Granville, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | NDIAYE Edriss G. | - | - | - | - | 1% | 99% |
2 | GUTH Joseph | - | - | 3% | 21% | 45% | 30% |
3 | STREB JR. Joseph T. | - | 1% | 9% | 38% | 52% | |
3 | BURTE Alexander J. | - | - | 8% | 39% | 53% | |
5 | ALLEN Henry G. | 1% | 11% | 39% | 40% | 9% | |
6 | CHAN Matthew | - | 2% | 19% | 48% | 31% | |
7 | CHEREDNICHENKO Ihor | - | 7% | 38% | 43% | 11% | |
8 | MAVANI Krishna | 17% | 57% | 23% | 3% | - | |
9 | WOJCIECHOWSKI Matthew N. | - | 2% | 22% | 48% | 28% | |
10 | STRINGER David | - | - | 7% | 32% | 43% | 17% |
11 | HICKEY Connor | - | 6% | 38% | 39% | 14% | 2% |
12 | ABRAMKIN Tim | - | 10% | 54% | 31% | 4% | - |
13 | COPELAND Nigel | - | 2% | 25% | 53% | 20% | - |
14 | LEVY Jacob | - | 9% | 42% | 41% | 9% | |
15 | BLAKEMAN Michael J. | 1% | 14% | 42% | 35% | 8% | |
16 | LINDOW Connor | 11% | 58% | 27% | 4% | - | |
17 | MANDZY Theodor | - | 1% | 17% | 42% | 33% | 8% |
18 | ZHAO Zhiyong | - | - | 6% | 38% | 56% | 1% |
19 | KABARITI Karim | 1% | 13% | 42% | 35% | 8% | |
20 | FREDERICK David R. | 34% | 47% | 17% | 2% | - | |
21 | LATTA Zamir | 36% | 53% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
22 | HAAS Zane | 36% | 53% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
23 | SMITH Brandon T. | 31% | 48% | 18% | 2% | - | |
23 | SIDARAS John | 77% | 21% | 1% | - | - | |
25 | HUGHES Evan | 48% | 45% | 6% | - | - | - |
26 | BRENTLINGER III Charles | 49% | 45% | 6% | - | - | - |
27 | ROOT-THOMPSON Kiah O. | 64% | 32% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.